Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24501360›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2014

Hippocampal binding of novel information with dominant memory traces can support both memory stability and change.

Donna J Bridge, Joel L Voss

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Hippocampus Guides Adaptive Learning during Dynamic Social Interactions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A Closer Look at the Hippocampus and Memory.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Flexible retrieval: When true inferences produce false memories.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2017
    Article
  14. Crime Scene Familiarity: Does it Influence Mock Jurors' Decisions?Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Donna J BridgeDepartment of Medical and Social Sciences, Ken and Ruth Davee Department of Neurology, and Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 60611.
Joel L Voss

Funding

PREDOCTORAL AND POSTDOCTORAL TRAINING PROGRAM IN AGING AND DEMENTIAT32AG020506 · NIA · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI ROBERT J VASSAR, SANDRA WEINTRAUB · 2002 to 2026
$9.9M
Neural systems for the dynamic use of memoryR00NS069788 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI VOSS, JOEL L · 2012 to 2014
$736k
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG020506NIA NIH HHS T32AG20506NINDS NIH HHS R00 NS069788NINDS NIH HHS R00-NS069788
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Memory stability and change are considered opposite outcomes. We tested the counterintuitive notion that both depend on one process: hippocampal binding of memory features to associatively novel information, or associative novelty binding (ANB). Building on the idea that dominant memory features, or "traces," are most susceptible to modification, we hypothesized that ANB would selectively involve dominant traces. Therefore, memory stability versus change should depend on whether the currently dominant trace is old versus updated; in either case, novel information will be bound with it, causing either maintenance (when old) or change (when updated). People in our experiment studied objects at locations within scenes (contexts). During reactivation in a new context, subjects moved studied objects to new locations either via active location recall or by passively dragging objects to predetermined locations. After active reactivation, the new object location became dominant in memory, whereas after passive reactivation, the old object location maintained dominance. In both cases, hippocampal ANB bound the currently dominant object-location memory with a context with which it was not paired previously (i.e., associatively novel). Stability occurred in the passive condition when ANB united the dominant original location trace with an associatively novel newer context. Change occurred in the active condition when ANB united the dominant updated object location with an associatively novel and older context. Hippocampal ANB of the currently dominant trace with associatively novel contextual information thus provides a single mechanism to support memory stability and change, with shifts in trace dominance during reactivation dictating the outcome.

Indexed as

AdultEye MovementsFemaleHippocampusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemoryMental RecallPhotic StimulationProtein BindingPsychomotor PerformanceYoung Adultmemoryreactivationreconsolidationrelational bindingretrievaltrace dominance

Identifiers

PMID24501360
PMCPMC3913868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.