Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24501342›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2014

Evaluation of the Borrelia burgdorferi BBA64 protein as a protective immunogen in mice.

Kevin S Brandt, Toni G Patton, Anna S Allard, Melissa J Caimano, Justin D Radolf, Robert D Gilmore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Protective efficacy of mutant strains ofInfection and immunity · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kevin S BrandtBacterial Diseases Branch, Division of Vector Borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Toni G Patton
Anna S Allard
Melissa J Caimano
Justin D Radolf
Robert D Gilmore

Funding

RpoS Regulation of Borrelia burgdorferi Genes in vivoR01AI029735 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SW MED CTR/DALLAS · PI CAIMANO, MELISSA J, RADOLF, JUSTIN D · 1990 to 2022
$10.7M
RpoS Regulation of Borrelia burgdorferi Genes in vivoR56AI029735 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI RADOLF, JUSTIN D · 2012 to 2012
$536k
Transit of Borrelia burgdorferi through the Ixodes scapularis midgut proceeds inR03AI085248 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI CAIMANO, MELISSA J · 2010 to 2011
$153k
NIAID NIH HHS AI29735NIAID NIH HHS AI85248NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI029735NIAID NIH HHS R03 AI085248NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI029735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Borrelia burgdorferi bba64 gene product is a surface-localized lipoprotein synthesized within mammalian and tick hosts and is involved in vector transmission of disease. These properties suggest that BBA64 may be a vaccine candidate against Lyme borreliosis. In this study, protective immunity against B. burgdorferi challenge was assessed in mice immunized with the BBA64 protein. Mice developed a high-titer antibody response following immunization with soluble recombinant BBA64 but were not protected when challenged by needle inoculation of culture-grown spirochetes. Likewise, mice passively immunized with an anti-BBA64 monoclonal antibody were not protected against needle-inoculated organisms. BBA64-immunized mice were subjected to B. burgdorferi challenge by the natural route of a tick bite, but these trials did not demonstrate significant protective immunity in either outbred or inbred strains of mice. Lipidated recombinant BBA64 produced in Escherichia coli was assessed for possible improved elicitation of a protective immune response. Although inoculation with this antigen produced a high-titer antibody response, the lipidated BBA64 also was unsuccessful in protecting mice from B. burgdorferi challenge by tick bites. Anti-BBA64 antibodies raised in rats eradicated the organisms, as evidenced by in vitro borreliacidal assays, thus demonstrating the potential for BBA64 to be effective as a protective immunogen. However, passive immunization with the same monospecific rat anti-BBA64 polyclonal serum failed to provide protection against tick bite-administered challenge. These results reveal the challenges faced in not only identifying B. burgdorferi proteins with potential protective capability but also in producing recombinant antigens conducive to preventive therapies against Lyme borreliosis.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialDisease Models, AnimalEscherichia coliFemaleGene ExpressionLyme DiseaseLyme Disease VaccinesMiceRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRecombinant ProteinsVaccines, SubunitVaccines, SyntheticAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, Bacterialbba64 protein, Borrelia burgdorferiLyme Disease VaccinesRecombinant ProteinsVaccines, SubunitVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID24501342
PMCPMC3993113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.