Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24501139›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2014

Recovery of otoacoustic emissions after high-level noise exposure in the American bullfrog.

Dwayne D Simmons, Rachel Lohr, Helena Wotring, Miriam D Burton, Rebecca A Hooper, Richard A Baird

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cut through the noise: vocal signals and auditory processing vary along an urbanization gradient in Pacific treefrogs.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. The paradox of hearing at the lek: auditory sensitivity increases after breeding in female gray treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis).Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dwayne D SimmonsDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, 610 Charles E. Young Drive East, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Rachel Lohr
Helena Wotring
Miriam D Burton
Rebecca A Hooper
Richard A Baird
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Sensory Function CoreP30DC004665 · NIDCD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI FADDIS, BRIAN T · 2001 to 2015
$8.0M
NEURAL SYSTEMS OF INGESTIVE BEHAVIORR01DC000240 · NIDCD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI HAJNAL, ANDRAS · 1989 to 2014
$5.1M
POSTNATAL DEVELOPMENT OF OLIVOCOCHLEAR NEURONSR01DC004086 · NIDCD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SIMMONS, DWAYNE D · 1998 to 2009
$3.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC00240NIDCD NIH HHS DC004086NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC004665NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000240NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The American bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) has an amphibian papilla (AP) that senses airborne, low-frequency sound and generates distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) similar to other vertebrate species. Although ranid frogs are typically found in noisy environments, the effects of noise on the AP have not been studied. First, we determined the noise levels that diminished DPOAE at 2f1-f2 using an f2 stimulus level at 80 dB SPL and that also produced morphological damage of the sensory epithelium. Second, we compared DPOAE (2f1-f2) responses with histopathologic changes occurring in bullfrogs after noise exposure. Consistent morphological damage, such as fragmented hair cells and missing bundles, as well as elimination of DPOAE responses were seen only after very high-level (>150 dB SPL) sound exposures. The morphological response of hair cells to noise differed along the mediolateral AP axis: medial hair cells were sensitive to noise and lateral hair cells were relatively insensitive to noise. Renewed or repaired hair cells were not observed until 9 days post-exposure. Following noise exposure, DPOAE responses disappeared within 24 h and then recovered to normal pre-exposure levels within 3-4 days. Our results suggest that DPOAEs in the bullfrog are sensitive to the initial period of hair cell damage. After noise-induced damage, the bullfrog AP has functional recovery mechanisms that do not depend on substantial hair cell regeneration or repair. Thus, the bullfrog auditory system might serve as an interesting model for investigation of ways to prevent noise damage.

Indexed as

NoiseAnimalsEar, InnerHair Cells, AuditoryHearing Loss, Noise-InducedOtoacoustic Emissions, SpontaneousRana catesbeianaRecovery of FunctionActive amplificationCubic distortion productHair CellsHearing lossRegeneration

Identifiers

PMID24501139
PMCPMC4006586
OpenAlexW2130195367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.