Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24501003›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2014

Two Arabidopsis loci encode novel eukaryotic initiation factor 4E isoforms that are functionally distinct from the conserved plant eukaryotic initiation factor 4E.

Ryan M Patrick, Laura K Mayberry, Grace Choy, Lauren E Woodard, Joceline S Liu, Allyson White, Rebecca A Mullen, Toug M Tanavin, Christopher A Latz, Karen S Browning

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Mutation of barleyFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. eIF4E1 RegulatesFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  13. eIF4E and Interactors from Unicellular Eukaryotes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cap-Independent mRNA Translation in Germ Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ryan M PatrickDepartment of Molecular Biosciences and the Institute of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712.
Laura K Mayberry
Grace Choy
Lauren E Woodard
Joceline S Liu
Allyson White
Rebecca A Mullen
Toug M Tanavin
Christopher A Latz
Karen S Browning
The University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Canonical translation initiation in eukaryotes begins with the Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4F (eIF4F) complex, made up of eIF4E, which recognizes the 7-methylguanosine cap of messenger RNA, and eIF4G, which serves as a scaffold to recruit other translation initiation factors that ultimately assemble the 80S ribosome. Many eukaryotes have secondary EIF4E genes with divergent properties. The model plant Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) encodes two such genes in tandem loci on chromosome 1, EIF4E1B (At1g29550) and EIF4E1C (At1g29590). This work identifies EIF4E1B/EIF4E1C-type genes as a Brassicaceae-specific diverged form of EIF4E. There is little evidence for EIF4E1C gene expression; however, the EIF4E1B gene appears to be expressed at low levels in most tissues, though microarray and RNA Sequencing data support enrichment in reproductive tissue. Purified recombinant eIF4E1b and eIF4E1c proteins retain cap-binding ability and form functional complexes in vitro with eIF4G. The eIF4E1b/eIF4E1c-type proteins support translation in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) but promote translation initiation in vitro at a lower rate compared with eIF4E. Findings from surface plasmon resonance studies indicate that eIF4E1b and eIF4E1c are unlikely to bind eIF4G in vivo when in competition with eIF4E. This study concludes that eIF4E1b/eIF4E1c-type proteins, although bona fide cap-binding proteins, have divergent properties and, based on apparent limited tissue distribution in Arabidopsis, should be considered functionally distinct from the canonical plant eIF4E involved in translation initiation.

Indexed as

Conserved SequenceGenetic LociAmino Acid SequenceArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsBiological AssayComputer SimulationElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelEukaryotic Initiation Factor-4EEukaryotic Initiation Factor-4GGenetic Complementation TestGuanosineMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyProtein BindingProtein Biosynthesis7-methylguanosineArabidopsis ProteinsEukaryotic Initiation Factor-4EEukaryotic Initiation Factor-4GGuanosineProtein Isoforms

Identifiers

PMID24501003
PMCPMC3982745
OpenAlexW2075440486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.