Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24500949›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2014

Combining FISH and model-based predictions to understand chromosome evolution in Typhonium (Araceae).

Aretuza Sousa, Natalie Cusimano, Susanne S Renner

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Chromosomal dynamics inFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. The Ribosomal DNA Loci of the Ancient MonocotFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  4. InterstitialPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Towards a FISH-based karyotype ofComparative cytogenetics · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aretuza SousaDepartment of Biology, University of Munich (LMU), D-80638 Munich, Germany.
Natalie Cusimano
Susanne S Renner
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsSince the advent of molecular phylogenetics, numerous attempts have been made to infer the evolutionary trajectories of chromosome numbers on DNA phylogenies. Ideally, such inferences should be evaluated against cytogenetic data. Towards this goal, we carried out phylogenetic modelling of chromosome number change and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in a medium sized genus of Araceae to elucidate if data from chromosomal markers would support maximum likelihood-inferred changes in chromosome numbers among close relatives. Typhonium, the focal genus, includes species with 2n = 65 and 2n = 8, the lowest known count in the family.

methodsA phylogeny from nuclear and plastid sequences (96 taxa, 4252 nucleotides) and counts for all included species (15 of them first reported here) were used to model chromosome number evolution, assuming discrete events, such as polyploidization and descending or ascending dysploidy, occurring at different rates. FISH with three probes (5S rDNA, 45S rDNA and Arabidopsis-like telomeres) was performed on ten species with 2n = 8 to 2n = 24. KEY

resultsThe best-fitting models assume numerous past chromosome number reductions. Of the species analysed with FISH, the two with the lowest chromosome numbers contained interstitial telomeric signals (Its), which together with the phylogeny and modelling indicates decreasing dysploidy as an explanation for the low numbers. A model-inferred polyploidization in another species is matched by an increase in rDNA sites.

conclusionsThe combination of a densely sampled phylogeny, ancestral state modelling and FISH revealed that the species with n = 4 is highly derived, with the FISH data pointing to a Robertsonian fusion-like chromosome rearrangement in the ancestor of this species.

Indexed as

AneuploidyAraceaeBase SequenceChromosomes, PlantCytogenetic AnalysisDNA, PlantDNA, RibosomalEvolution, MolecularGenetic MarkersIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceLikelihood FunctionsPhylogenyPlastidsSpecies SpecificityTelomereDNA, PlantDNA, RibosomalGenetic Markers45S rDNA5S rDNAAncestral trait reconstructionaneuploid chromosome numbersAraceaeBayesian inferencechromosome evolutionFISHmaximum likelihood inferencetelomeresTyphonium

Identifiers

PMID24500949
PMCPMC3936593
OpenAlexW2164488393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.