ReviewHip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy
Hemiarthroplasties after hip fractures in Norway and Sweden: a collaboration between the Norwegian and Swedish national registries.
Review in Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- More complications in uncemented compared to cemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: a randomized controlled trial of 201 patients, with one year follow-up.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2017Trial
- Total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture: an overview of systematic reviews total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture: an overview of systematic reviews.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Review
- Review
- Increased rates of periprosthetic joint infection following hip hemiarthroplasty with clindamycin prophylaxis compared to cefazolin.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Article
- The use of a modified posterior approach (SPAIRE) may be associated with an increase in return to pre-injury level of mobility compared to a standard lateral approach in hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular hip fractures: a single-centre study of the first 285 cases over a period of 3.5 years.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023Article
- Cemented hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture patients: collarless, polished tapered stem (CPT) versus anatomic matte stem (Lubinus SP2).European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2021Article
- CORR Insights®: Cemented or Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture? Data From the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2020Article
- Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture.JBJS essential surgical techniques · 2019Article
- Validation of orthopaedic surgeons' assessment of cognitive function in patients with acute hip fracture.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2019Article
- Guest Editorial: An Appeal for Evidenced-based Care and Adoption of Best Practices in the Management of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2019Article
- Hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty in 30,830 patients with hip fractures: data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register on revision and risk factors for revision.Acta orthopaedica · 2018Article
- Hidden blood loss and its risk factors after hip hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: a cross-sectional study.Clinical interventions in aging · 2018Article
- Reduced revision rate and maintained function after hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures after transition from posterolateral to direct lateral approach.Acta orthopaedica · 2017Article
- Thompson hemiarthroplastyBone & joint research · 2017Article
- Posterior approach and uncemented stems increases the risk of reoperation after hemiarthroplasties in elderly hip fracture patients.Acta orthopaedica · 2014Article
- CORR Insights ®: Randomized trial of hemiarthroplasty versus internal fixation for femoral neck fractures: no differences at 6 years.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2014Article
- Modes of failure of hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgieArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
National registration of hemiarthroplasties after hip fractures has been established in both Norway and Sweden. We aimed to investigate differences in demographics, choice of implant selection, surgical approaches, and reoperations between the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register (NHFR) and the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (SHAR). As part of the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) project a common hemiarthroplasty dataset has been established. 36,989 primary hemiarthroplasties (HAs) for acute hip fractures reported to NHFR (n = 12,761) and SHAR (n = 24,228) for the period 2005-2010 were included. Cemented prostheses were used in 78% of the operations in Norway and in 95% of the patients in Sweden. In Norway HAs almost exclusively had bipolar design (98%), whereas in Sweden HAs with unipolar design were used in 42% of the cases. Monoblock (non-modular) prostheses were uncommon, but still more frequently used in Sweden than in Norway (6.9% and 2.1% respectively). The lateral approach was more common in Norway (83%) than in Sweden (52%), where the posterior approach was used in 42% of the cases. The five-year survival of all HAs was 95.5% (95% CI: 94.8-96.2) in Norway and 94.8% (95% CI: 94.4-95.3) in Sweden. We concluded that surprisingly large differences between the two countries in demographics, implant design, and surgical technique had been revealed. This common dataset enables further investigations of the impact of these differences on revision rates and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.