Trial reportDigestive diseases and sciences2014
Patient experiences with surveillance endoscopy: a qualitative study.
Trial report in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06968871 (Effects of the Ameliorated Pap Test on Cervical Cancer Screening Participation), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effects of the Ameliorated Pap Test on Cervical Cancer Screening Participation: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Guideline
- How are we measuring health-related quality of life in patients with a Barrett Esophagus? A systematic review on patient-reported outcome measurements.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022Pooled it
- Exploring patients' perceptions and experiences of treatments for the prevention of variceal bleeding: a qualitative study.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2021Trial
- Factors influencing the patient experience of gastrointestinal endoscopic ultrasound: a Swedish cross-sectional study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Prevalence and associated factors of worry for cancer in patients with a Barrett's esophagus.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Patient participation in gastrointestinal endoscopy - From patients' perspectives.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020Article
- Patient experience of gastrointestinal endoscopy: informing the development of the Newcastle ENDOPREM™.Frontline gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Comparative quantitative survey of patient experience in Barrett's oesophagus and other gastrointestinal disorders.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Acceptability to patients of screening disposable transnasal endoscopy: qualitative interview analysis.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Barrett's oesophagus: A qualitative study of patient burden, care delivery experience and follow-up needs.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019Article
- Decision aids for shared decision-making in Barrett's esophagus surveillance.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrior studies examining patterns of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) surveillance in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) demonstrate variable adherence to practice guidelines. In prior studies, memories of endoscopic experiences shaped overall perceptions and subsequent adherence behaviors, but the specific elements of that experience are unclear. We sought to identify specific elements of the EGD experience that frame overall perceptions of surveillance.
methodsWe conducted structured in-depth, qualitative interviews with BE patients with a range of severity (non-dysplastic, low-grade and high-grade dysplasia) who recently completed an EGD. Data collection continued until we reached thematic saturation (n = 20). We applied principles of framework analysis to identify emerging themes regarding patients' salient EGD experiences. We validated our coding scheme through multidisciplinary consensus meetings comprised of clinician (gastroenterologist and internist) and non-clinician investigators (sociologist and public health expert).
resultsPatient experiences can be conceptualized within a temporal model: prior to, during, and after endoscopy. The most memorable aspects of the EGD experience include physician-patient communication prior to EGD, wait time at the endoscopy center, interpersonal interactions at the time of the EGD, level of pain or discomfort with the procedure, level of trust in the physician following EGD, and gaining a sense of control over BE.
conclusionsWe identified six salient memories before, during, and after the procedure that shape patients' perceptions of the EGD experience. We offer recommendations for measuring patient experiences using a composite of validated survey items. Future studies should test the relation of patient experience measures and adherence to surveillance EGD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.