ArticleThe Journal of clinical psychiatry2014
National trends in second-generation antipsychotic augmentation for nonpsychotic depression.
Article in The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antidepressive Effect of Antipsychotics in the Treatment of Schizophrenia: Meta-Regression Analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2021Pooled it
- Sertraline and quetiapine induced Serotonin Syndrome and Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome: a case report.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Aripiprazole or Bupropion Augmentation Versus Switching to Bupropion in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Risk-Benefit Analysis.The Journal of clinical psychiatry · 2025Article
- Review
- 20-Year Trends in the Pharmacologic Treatment of Bipolar Disorder by Psychiatrists in Outpatient Care Settings.The American journal of psychiatry · 2020Article
- Article
- The emergence of new antidepressants for clinical use: Agomelatine paradox versus other novel agents.IBRO reports · 2019Review
- The impact of depression medications on oral antidiabetic drug adherence in patients with diabetes and depression.Journal of diabetes and its complications · 2018Article
- Non-communicable disease syndemics: poverty, depression, and diabetes among low-income populations.Lancet (London, England) · 2017Review
- Adjunctive Therapy With Second-Generation Antipsychotics: The New Standard for Treatment-Resistant Depression?Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2016Article
- Mental health service use for adult patients with co-occurring depression and physical chronic health care needs, 2007-2010.Medical care · 2015Article
- Review
- Indian Psychiatric Society multicentric study: Prescription patterns of psychotropics in India.Indian journal of psychiatry · 2014Article
- Antipsychotic Medication Treatment Patterns in Adult Depression.The Journal of clinical psychiatryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study estimates national trends and patterns in use of second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) for adjunctive treatment of nonpsychotic adult depression in office-based practice.
methodTwelve consecutive years (1999-2010) of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey were analyzed to estimate trends and patterns of adjunctive SGA treatment for adult (≥ 18 years) nonpsychotic depression in office-based visits. Adjunctive SGA use was examined among all office visits in which depression was diagnosed (N = 7,767), excluding visits with diagnoses for alternative SGA indications (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, pervasive development disorder, psychotic depression, dementia) and those without an active antidepressant prescription.
resultsFrom 1999 to 2010, 8.6% of adult depression visits included an SGA. SGA use rates increased from 4.6% in 1999-2000 to 12.5% in 2009-2010, with an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for time trend of 2.78 (95% CI, 1.84-4.20). The increase in SGA augmentation was broad-based, with no significant differences in time trends between demographic and clinical subgroups. For the most recent survey years (2005-2010), SGA use rates were higher in visits to psychiatrists than to other physicians (AOR = 5.08; 95% CI, 2.96-8.73), visits covered by public than private insurance (AOR = 3.20; 95% CI, 2.25-4.54), visits with diagnosed major depressive disorder than other depressive disorders (AOR = 1.49; 95% CI, 1.08-2.06), and visits with diabetes, hyperlipidemia, or cardiovascular disease (AOR = 2.13; 95% CI, 1.12-4.03) and lower in visits by patients > 65 years than 18-44 years (AOR = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.32-0.82) and visits that included psychotherapy (AOR = 0.68; 95% CI, 0.47-0.96).
conclusionsBetween 1999 and 2010, SGAs were increasingly accepted in the outpatient treatment of adult nonpsychotic depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.