Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24500170›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2014

Within-population variability in a moth sex pheromone blend: genetic basis and behavioural consequences.

Astrid T Groot, Gerhard Schöfl, Ollie Inglis, Susanne Donnerhacke, Alice Classen, Antje Schmalz, Richard G Santangelo, Jennifer Emerson, Fred Gould, Coby Schal and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Astrid T GrootIBED, University of Amsterdam, , Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Department Entomology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, , Hans Knöll Strasse 8, Jena 07745, Germany, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology, , Beutenbergstrasse 11A, Jena 07745, Germany, Department Entomology, North Carolina State University, , 100 Derieux Place, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613, USA, W. M. Keck Center for Behavioral Biology, North Carolina State University, , Raleigh, NC 27695-7617, USA.
Gerhard Schöfl
Ollie Inglis
Susanne Donnerhacke
Alice Classen
Antje Schmalz
Richard G Santangelo
Jennifer Emerson
Fred Gould
Coby Schal
David G Heckel
North Carolina State University · USMax Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology · DELeibniz-Institut für Naturstoff-Forschung und Infektionsbiologie e. V. - Hans-Knöll-Institut (HKI) · DEUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolutionary diversification of sexual communication systems in moths is perplexing because signal and response are under stabilizing selection in many species, and this is expected to constrain evolutionary change. In the moth Heliothis virescens, we consistently found high phenotypic variability in the female sex pheromone blend within each of four geographically distant populations. Here, we assess the heritability, genetic basis and behavioural consequences of this variation. Artificial selection with field-collected moths dramatically increased the relative amount of the saturated compound 16:Ald and decreased its unsaturated counterpart Z11-16:Ald, the major sex pheromone component (high line). In a cross between the high- and low-selected lines, one quantitative trait locus (QTL) explained 11-21% of the phenotypic variance in the 16:Ald/Z11-16:Ald ratio. Because changes in activity of desaturase enzymes could affect this ratio, we measured their expression levels in pheromone glands and mapped desaturase genes onto our linkage map. A delta-11-desaturase had lower expression in females producing less Z11-16:Ald; however, this gene mapped to a different chromosome than the QTL. A model in which the QTL is a trans-acting repressor of delta-11 desaturase expression explains many features of the data. Selection favouring heterozygotes which produce more unsaturated components could maintain a polymorphism at this locus.

Indexed as

Sexual Behavior, AnimalAnimalsGenetic VariationInbreedingInsect ProteinsMothsPhenotypeQuantitative Trait LociSex AttractantsInsect ProteinsSex Attractantsbalancing selectiondelta-11-desaturaseHeliothis virescensheterozygote advantageLepidopteraquantitative trait locus analysis

Identifiers

PMID24500170
PMCPMC3924083
OpenAlexW2170482542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.