Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24500163›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2014

Morphological basis for the evolution of acoustic diversity in oscine songbirds.

Tobias Riede, Franz Goller

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Respiratory contributions to birdsong-evolutionary considerations and open questions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sound Analysis to Predict the Growth of Turkeys.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Identity and novelty in the avian syrinx.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Controllable biomimetic birdsong.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tobias RiedeDepartment of Biology, University of Utah, , Salt Lake City, Utah 257 S 1400 E, USA.
Franz Goller
University of Utah · US

Funding

Mechanisms for producing complex sounds R01DC006876 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI GOLLER, FRANZ · 2005 to 2014
$2.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC06876
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acoustic properties of vocalizations arise through the interplay of neural control with the morphology and biomechanics of the sound generating organ, but in songbirds it is assumed that the main driver of acoustic diversity is variation in telencephalic motor control. Here we show, however, that variation in the composition of the vibrating tissues, the labia, underlies diversity in one acoustic parameter, fundamental frequency (F0) range. Lateral asymmetry and arrangement of fibrous proteins in the labia into distinct layers is correlated with expanded F0 range of species. The composition of the vibrating tissues thus represents an important morphological foundation for the generation of a broad F0 range, indicating that morphological specialization lays the foundation for the evolution of complex acoustic repertoires.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionVocalization, AnimalAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaSongbirdsVibrationanisotropyextracellular matrixvocal behaviour

Identifiers

PMID24500163
PMCPMC3924064
OpenAlexW1992764183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.