ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2014
Executive summary: Evaluating the evidence base to support the inclusion of infants and children from birth to 24 mo of age in the Dietary Guidelines for Americans--"the B-24 Project".
Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.
- Infant milk-feeding practices and food allergies, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, and asthma throughout the life span: a systematic review.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2019Pooled it
- Infant milk-feeding practices and childhood leukemia: a systematic review.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2019Pooled it
- Infant milk-feeding practices and cardiovascular disease outcomes in offspring: a systematic review.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2019Pooled it
- Infant milk-feeding practices and diagnosed celiac disease and inflammatory bowel disease in offspring: a systematic review.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2019Pooled it
- Infant milk-feeding practices and diabetes outcomes in offspring: a systematic review.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2019Pooled it
- Executive summary: evaluation of the evidence to support practice guidelines for nutritional care of preterm infants-the Pre-B Project.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2016Pooled it
- Trial
- Learning to like vegetables during breastfeeding: a randomized clinical trial of lactating mothers and infants.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2017Trial
- Co-Development of Infant Satiation Cues and Maternal Feeding Behaviors during Infancy.Current developments in nutrition · 2025Article
- Differences in Infant Diet Quality Index by Race and Ethnicity Predict Differences in Later Diet Quality.The Journal of nutrition · 2023Article
- Major and trace mineral composition of milk from lactating women following vegan, vegetarian and omnivore diets.The British journal of nutrition · 2023Article
- The "Breastmilk Ecology: Genesis of Infant Nutrition (BEGIN)" Project - executive summary.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2023Article
- Breastfeeding: How is it related to food insecurity and other factors among low-income mothers?Health care for women international · 2023Article
- The Infant Diet Quality Index Predicts Dietary and Adiposity Outcomes in US Children 2 to 4 years old.The Journal of nutrition · 2023Article
- An evidence-informed approach to address food and nutrition security: the ecology of infant feeding practices.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- USDA Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review's collaborative approach for conducting systematic reviews: Promoting diversity of expertise while managing potential conflicts of interest.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Review
- Perspective: Early-Life Nutrition Research Supported by the US National Institutes of Health from 2018 to 2020.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- An Active Image-Based Mobile Food Record Is Feasible for Capturing Eating Occasions among Infants Ages 3-12 Months Old in Hawai'i.Nutrients · 2022Article
- Article
- Perspective: Nutritional Status as a Biological Variable (NABV): Integrating Nutrition Science into Basic and Clinical Research and Care.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) are the cornerstone of US government efforts to promote health and prevent disease through diet and nutrition. The DGA currently provides guidelines for ages ≥ 2 y. In an effort to determine the strength of the evidence to support the inclusion of infants and children from birth to age 24 mo, the partner agencies led by the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion and the USDA Center for Nutrition Program and Policy initiated the project entitled "Evaluating the evidence base to support the inclusion of infants and children from birth to 24 months of age in the Dietary Guidelines for Americans--the B-24 Project." This project represents the first step in the process of applying systematic reviews to the process of deciding whether the evidence is sufficient to include this age group in future editions of the DGA. This supplement includes the B-24 Executive Summary, which describes the B-24 Project and the deliberations of the 4 working groups during the process of developing priority topics for the systematic review, and a research agenda to address the critical gaps. Also included in this supplement issue is an article on the Nutrition Evidence Library methodology for developing systematic review questions and articles from the invited content presenters at the B-24 Prime meeting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.