ArticleAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2014
Disgusted, embarrassed, annoyed: affective associations relate to uptake of colonoscopy screening.
Article in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychosocial Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening Intention: An Experiment on the Invitation Letter.International journal of behavioral medicine · 2023Trial
- Assessing Colorectal Cancer Screening Barriers by Two Methods.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2018Trial
- Testing Explanations for Skepticism of Personalized Risk Information.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2023Article
- The effects of social-media based social comparison information and similarity mindsets on COVID-19 vaccination uptake cognitions.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2023Article
- Quality indicators of colonoscopy care: a qualitative study from the perspectives of colonoscopy participants and nurses.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Persistent Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion Amid Centralized Outreach: A Mixed Methods Study.American journal of health promotion : AJHP · 2022Article
- Types of anticipated affect that encourage and discourage vaccination: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Could a Behavioral Model Explain Adherence to Second-Level Colonoscopy for Colon Cancer Screening? Results of a Cross-Sectional Study of the Palermo Province Population.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- What Drives Preventive Health Behavior During a Global Pandemic? Emotion and Worry.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2021Article
- Risk Ladder, Table, or Bulleted List? Identifying Formats That Effectively Communicate Personalized Risk and Risk Reduction Information for Multiple Diseases.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2021Article
- Characteristics and attitudes of first round invitees in the Irish National Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme.Frontline gastroenterology · 2021Article
- The influence of affect on HPV vaccine decision making in an HPV vaccine naïve college student population.Preventive medicine reports · 2020Article
- Development of FamilyTalk: an Intervention to Support Communication and Educate Families About Colorectal Cancer Risk.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020Article
- Affective components of perceived risk mediate the relation between cognitively-based perceived risk and colonoscopy screening.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2020Article
- Customer discovery as a tool for moving behavioral interventions into the marketplace: insights from the NCI SPRINT program.Translational behavioral medicine · 2019Article
- Moving beyond categorization to understand affective influences on real world health decisions.Social and personality psychology compass · 2019Article
- Decision-making and socioeconomic disparities in colonoscopy screening in African Americans.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2018Article
- Perceived Threat and Internet Use Predict Intentions to Get Bowel Cancer Screening (Colonoscopy): Longitudinal Questionnaire Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018Article
- Designing a randomized controlled trial to evaluate a community-based narrative intervention for improving colorectal cancer screening for African Americans.Contemporary clinical trials · 2018Article
- Can you un-ring the bell? A qualitative study of how affect influences cancer screening decisions.BMC cancer · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUptake of colorectal cancer screening is lower than desired. Screening decision making research has traditionally focused on benefits and barriers to screening. This study examines the relation of affective associations with screening (feelings and emotions associated with screening) to colonoscopy screening uptake.
methodsParticipants were 103 African American community adults. Participants completed a structured interview assessing perceived benefits of and barriers to colonoscopy screening, affective associations with colonoscopy, colonoscopy screening behavior, and intentions for future screening.
resultsHigher positive and lower negative affective associations with screening were both significant predictors of colonoscopy uptake. Affective associations fully mediated the relation of perceived benefits and barriers to screening uptake. Affective associations were associated with intentions for future screening.
conclusionsIncorporation of affective associations into models of screening decision making and intervention approaches to address screening compliance has utility for advancing our understanding of screening adherence as well as increasing screening rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.