Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24500022›Full record

ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2015

Blending Qualitative and Computational Linguistics Methods for Fidelity Assessment: Experience with the Familias Unidas Preventive Intervention.

Carlos Gallo, Hilda Pantin, Juan Villamar, Guillermo Prado, Maria Tapia, Mitsunori Ogihara, Gracelyn Cruden, C Hendricks Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Three Flavorings for a Soup to Cure what Ails Mental Health Services.Administration and policy in mental health · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Human Subjects Protection and Technology in Prevention Science: Selected Opportunities and Challenges.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Effectiveness and Efficiency of Observationally Assessing Fidelity to a Family-Centered Child Intervention: A Quasi-Experimental Study.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Carlos GalloDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Fienberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 680 N. Lake Shore Drive, Suite 1400, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA, carlos.gallo@northwestern.edu.
Hilda Pantin
Juan Villamar
Guillermo Prado
Maria Tapia
Mitsunori Ogihara
Gracelyn Cruden
C Hendricks Brown

Funding

University of Miami Developmental Center for AIDS Research (D-CFAR)P30AI073961 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Rana Chakraborty · 2007 to 2026
$33.8M
INNOVATIVE IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH METHODS COREP30DA027828 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BROWN, C. HENDRICKS · 2011 to 2020
$11.4M
Familias Unidas Stage III Study: Preventing Substance Abuse in Hispanic YouthR01DA025192 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI PRADO, GUILLERMO · 2009 to 2013
$3.9M
PS07-003, Minority HIV/AIDS Research Initiative (MARI)U01PS000671 · PS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI PRADO, GUILLERMO · 2007 to 2011
$1.1M
NCHHSTP CDC HHS U01PS0000671NCHHSTP CDC HHS U01 PS000671NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI073961NIAID NIH HHS P30AI073961NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA027828NIDA NIH HHS P30DA027828NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA025192NIDA NIH HHS R01DA025192
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Careful fidelity monitoring and feedback are critical to implementing effective interventions. A wide range of procedures exist to assess fidelity; most are derived from observational assessments (Schoenwald and Garland, Psycholog Assess 25:146-156, 2013). However, these fidelity measures are resource intensive for research teams in efficacy/effectiveness trials, and are often unattainable or unmanageable for the host organization to rate when the program is implemented on a large scale. We present a first step towards automated processing of linguistic patterns in fidelity monitoring of a behavioral intervention using an innovative mixed methods approach to fidelity assessment that uses rule-based, computational linguistics to overcome major resource burdens. Data come from an effectiveness trial of the Familias Unidas intervention, an evidence-based, family-centered preventive intervention found to be efficacious in reducing conduct problems, substance use and HIV sexual risk behaviors among Hispanic youth. This computational approach focuses on "joining," which measures the quality of the working alliance of the facilitator with the family. Quantitative assessments of reliability are provided. Kappa scores between a human rater and a machine rater for the new method for measuring joining reached 0.83. Early findings suggest that this approach can reduce the high cost of fidelity measurement and the time delay between fidelity assessment and feedback to facilitators; it also has the potential for improving the quality of intervention fidelity ratings.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based PracticeLinguisticsPreventive MedicineProcess Assessment, Health CareRisk-TakingSchool Health ServicesStatistics as TopicAdolescentConduct DisorderFamily HealthFemaleHealth Services ResearchHispanic or LatinoHIV InfectionsHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID24500022
PMCPMC4125546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.