ArticlePLoS computational biology2014
Global patterns of protein domain gain and loss in superkingdoms.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed.
- Universal and Lineage-Specific Patterns in the Distribution of ECOD Domain Homology Groups Across Superkingdoms.Proteins · 2026Article
- The pangenome enhances the understanding of the genetic diversity of papaya.Horticulture research · 2026Article
- Evolution of the Metazoan Protein Domain Repertoire Revealed by a Birth-Death-Gain Model.Journal of molecular evolution · 2025Article
- Evolution of intrinsic disorder in the structural domains of viral and cellular proteomes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- On Protein Loops, Prior Molecular States and Common Ancestors of Life.Journal of molecular evolution · 2024Review
- Are Viruses Taxonomic Units? A Protein Domain and Loop-Centric Phylogenomic Assessment.Viruses · 2024Review
- Global characterization of biosynthetic gene clusters in non-model eukaryotes using domain architectures.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Genomic Survey of Flavin Monooxygenases in Wild and Cultivated Rice Provides Insight into Evolution and Functional Diversities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Functional Consequences of Shifting Transcript Boundaries in Glucose Starvation.Molecular and cellular biology · 2023Article
- Intraspecies characterization of bacteria via evolutionary modeling of protein domains.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Protein folds as synapomorphies of the tree of life.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2022Article
- Article
- The Compressed Vocabulary of Microbial Life.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Investigating the Concept and Origin of Viruses.Trends in microbiology · 2020Review
- Bacterial Origin and Reductive Evolution of the CPR Group.Genome biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Family-Specific Gains and Losses of Protein Domains in the Legume and Grass Plant Families.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2020Article
- A Place for Viruses on the Tree of Life.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Review
- Investigation of the Relationship between the S1 Domain and Its Molecular Functions Derived from Studies of the Tertiary Structure.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Testing Empirical Support for Evolutionary Models that Root the Tree of Life.Journal of molecular evolution · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Domains are modules within proteins that can fold and function independently and are evolutionarily conserved. Here we compared the usage and distribution of protein domain families in the free-living proteomes of Archaea, Bacteria and Eukarya and reconstructed species phylogenies while tracing the history of domain emergence and loss in proteomes. We show that both gains and losses of domains occurred frequently during proteome evolution. The rate of domain discovery increased approximately linearly in evolutionary time. Remarkably, gains generally outnumbered losses and the gain-to-loss ratios were much higher in akaryotes compared to eukaryotes. Functional annotations of domain families revealed that both Archaea and Bacteria gained and lost metabolic capabilities during the course of evolution while Eukarya acquired a number of diverse molecular functions including those involved in extracellular processes, immunological mechanisms, and cell regulation. Results also highlighted significant contemporary sharing of informational enzymes between Archaea and Eukarya and metabolic enzymes between Bacteria and Eukarya. Finally, the analysis provided useful insights into the evolution of species. The archaeal superkingdom appeared first in evolution by gradual loss of ancestral domains, bacterial lineages were the first to gain superkingdom-specific domains, and eukaryotes (likely) originated when an expanding proto-eukaryotic stem lineage gained organelles through endosymbiosis of already diversified bacterial lineages. The evolutionary dynamics of domain families in proteomes and the increasing number of domain gains is predicted to redefine the persistence strategies of organisms in superkingdoms, influence the make up of molecular functions, and enhance organismal complexity by the generation of new domain architectures. This dynamics highlights ongoing secondary evolutionary adaptations in akaryotic microbes, especially Archaea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.