Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24499930›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2014

Robustness of DNA repair through collective rate control.

Paul Verbruggen, Tim Heinemann, Erik Manders, Gesa von Bornstaedt, Roel van Driel, Thomas Höfer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The effect of Fernblock® in preventing blue-light-induced oxidative stress and cellular damage in retinal pigment epithelial cells is associated with NRF2 induction.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul VerbruggenDivision of Theoretical Systems Biology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany ; Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tim HeinemannDivision of Theoretical Systems Biology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany ; BioQuant Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Erik MandersSwammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gesa von BornstaedtDivision of Theoretical Systems Biology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany ; BioQuant Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Roel van DrielSwammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Thomas HöferDivision of Theoretical Systems Biology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany ; BioQuant Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity of Amsterdam · NLGerman Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA repair and other chromatin-associated processes are carried out by enzymatic macromolecular complexes that assemble at specific sites on the chromatin fiber. How the rate of these molecular machineries is regulated by their constituent parts is poorly understood. Here we quantify nucleotide-excision DNA repair in mammalian cells and find that, despite the pathways' molecular complexity, repair effectively obeys slow first-order kinetics. Theoretical analysis and data-based modeling indicate that these kinetics are not due to a singular rate-limiting step. Rather, first-order kinetics emerge from the interplay of rapidly and reversibly assembling repair proteins, stochastically distributing DNA lesion repair over a broad time period. Based on this mechanism, the model predicts that the repair proteins collectively control the repair rate. Exploiting natural cell-to-cell variability, we corroborate this prediction for the lesion-recognition factor XPC and the downstream factor XPA. Our findings provide a rationale for the emergence of slow time scales in chromatin-associated processes from fast molecular steps and suggest that collective rate control might be a widespread mode of robust regulation in DNA repair and transcription.

Indexed as

DNA RepairModels, ChemicalAlgorithmsAnimalsCell CycleCell LineChromatinDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDNA ReplicationGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHumansKineticsTime FactorsTranscription, GeneticUrea1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylureaChromatinDNADNA-Binding ProteinsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsUreaXeroderma Pigmentosum Group A ProteinXPA protein, humanXPC protein, human

Identifiers

PMID24499930
PMCPMC3907289
OpenAlexW1979827214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.