Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24499825›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2015

Epidemiological trends of pancreatic and gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors in Japan: a nationwide survey analysis.

Tetsuhide Ito, Hisato Igarashi, Kazuhiko Nakamura, Hironobu Sasano, Takuji Okusaka, Koji Takano, Izumi Komoto, Masao Tanaka, Masayuki Imamura, Robert T Jensen and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 193 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
193citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

193 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 415 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Endocrine journal · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

133 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Tetsuhide ItoDepartment of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan, itopapa@intmed3.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp.
Hisato Igarashi
Kazuhiko Nakamura
Hironobu Sasano
Takuji Okusaka
Koji Takano
Izumi Komoto
Masao Tanaka
Masayuki Imamura
Robert T Jensen
Ryoichi Takayanagi
Akira Shimatsu
Kyushu University · JPKansai Electric Power Hospital · JPKyoto Medical Center · JPNational Cancer Center · USNational Institutes of Health · USThe University of Tokyo · JPTohoku University · JP

Funding

Diagnosis, Natural History, Management,tumor biology of Gastrinomas/PETs/Neuroendocrine tumorsZIADK053200 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI JENSEN, ROBERT · 2009 to 2025
$4.3M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare, the number of patients with NET is increasing. However, in Japan, there have been no epidemiological studies on NET since 2005; thus, the prevalence of NET remains unknown.

methodsWe reported the epidemiology of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) [pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) and gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (GI-NETs)] in Japan in 2005. Here, we conducted the second nationwide survey on patients with GEP-NETs who received treatment in 2010.

resultsA total of 3,379 patients received treatment for PNETs in 2010, representing a 1.2-fold increase in the number of patients from 2005 to 2010. The prevalence was estimated to be 2.69/100,000, with an annual onset incidence of 1.27/100,000 in 2010. Non-functioning tumor (NF)-PNETs comprised 65.5% of cases followed by insulinoma (20.9%) and gastrinoma (8.2%). Interestingly, the number of patients with NF-PNETs increased ~1.8 fold since 2005. A total of 19.9% of patients exhibited distant metastasis at initial diagnosis; 4.3% had complications with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1), and only 4.0% had NF-PNETs associated with MEN-1. Meanwhile, an estimated 8,088 patients received treatment for GI-NETs, representing a ~1.8-fold increase since 2005. The prevalence was estimated to be 6.42/100,000, with an annual onset incidence of 3.51/100,000. The locations of GI-NETs varied: foregut, 26.1%; midgut, 3.6%; and hindgut, 70.3%. Distant metastasis and complications with MEN-1 were observed in 6.0 and 0.42% at initial diagnosis, respectively. The frequency of carcinoid syndrome in patients with GI-NETs was 3.2%.

conclusionWe clarified the epidemiological changes in GEP-NETs from 2005 to 2010 in Japan.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal NeoplasmsHealth SurveysHumansJapanMalignant Carcinoid SyndromeMultiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1Neuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID24499825
OpenAlexW1968010660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.