Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24499111›Full record

Trial reportBMC surgery2013

A double blind randomized controlled trial comparing primary suture closure with mesh augmented closure to reduce incisional hernia incidence.

Jeroen Nieuwenhuizen, Hasan H Eker, Lucas Timmermans, Wim C J Hop, Gert-Jan Kleinrensink, Johannes Jeekel, Johan F Lange, PRIMA Trialist Group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00761475 (Primary Mesh Closure of Abdominal Midline Wounds; a Prospective Randomized Multicenter Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00761475 phase3completednot on this map

Primary Mesh Closure of Abdominal Midline Wounds; a Prospective Randomized Multicenter Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorErasmus Medical CenterRan2009 to 2015Enrolled480ConditionsIncisional Hernia OccurenceArmsmesh supported closure, primary closure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Are eviscerations preventable?Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Suturable mesh better resists early laparotomy failure in a cyclic ball-burst model.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeroen Nieuwenhuizen
Hasan H Eker
Lucas TimmermansDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. l.timmermans@erasmusmc.nl.
Wim C J Hop
Gert-Jan Kleinrensink
Johannes Jeekel
Johan F Lange
PRIMA Trialist Group
Erasmus MC · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncisional hernia is the most frequently seen long term complication after laparotomy causing much morbidity and even mortality. The overall incidence remains 11-20%, despite studies attempting to optimize closing techniques. Two patient groups, patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm and obese patients, have a risk for incisional hernia after laparotomy of more than 30%. These patients might benefit from mesh augmented midline closure as a means to reduce incisional hernia incidence. METHODS/

designThe PRImary Mesh Closure of Abdominal Midline Wound (PRIMA) trial is a double-blinded international multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing running slowly absorbable suture closure with the same closure augmented with a sublay or onlay mesh. Primary endpoint will be incisional hernia incidence 2 years postoperatively. Secondary outcomes will be postoperative complications, pain, quality of life and cost effectiveness.A total of 460 patients will be included in three arms of the study and randomized between running suture closure, onlay mesh closure or sublay mesh closure. Follow-up will be at 1, 3, 12 and 24 months with ultrasound imaging performed at 6 and 24 months to objectify the presence of incisional hernia. Patients, investigators and radiologists will be blinded throughout the whole follow up. DISCCUSION: The use of prosthetic mesh has proven effective and safe in incisional hernia surgery however its use in a prophylactic manner has yet to be properly investigated. The PRIMA trial will provide level 1b evidence whether mesh augmented midline abdominal closure reduces incisional hernia incidence in high risk groups.

trial registrationClinical trial.gov NCT00761475.

Indexed as

Abdominal Wound Closure TechniquesLaparotomySurgical MeshSuture TechniquesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAortic Aneurysm, AbdominalClinical ProtocolsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHernia, VentralHumansIncidence

Identifiers

PMID24499111
PMCPMC3840708
OpenAlexW2140880877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.