Trial reportBMC surgery2013
A double blind randomized controlled trial comparing primary suture closure with mesh augmented closure to reduce incisional hernia incidence.
Trial report in BMC surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00761475 (Primary Mesh Closure of Abdominal Midline Wounds; a Prospective Randomized Multicenter Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Primary Mesh Closure of Abdominal Midline Wounds; a Prospective Randomized Multicenter Trial
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of prophylactic mesh implantation on the development of incisional hernias in patients with elevated BMI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Prophylactic Mesh After Midline Laparotomy: Evidence is out There, but why do Surgeons Hesitate?World journal of surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Trial
- Trial
- Article
- Review
- Are eviscerations preventable?Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes · 2025Article
- A Biomechanical Analysis of Prophylactic Mesh Reinforced Porcine Laparotomy Incisions.The Journal of surgical research · 2022Article
- Assessment of Quality of Life after Endovascular and Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Can Electric Nose Breath Analysis Identify Abdominal Wall Hernia Recurrence and Aortic Aneurysms? A Proof-of-Concept Study.Surgical innovation · 2020Article
- Suturable mesh better resists early laparotomy failure in a cyclic ball-burst model.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2020Article
- Article
- Onlay parastomal hernia repair with cross-linked porcine dermal collagen biologic mesh: long-term results.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2016Article
- One year experience of swine dermal non-crosslinked collagen prostheses for abdominal wall repairs in elective and emergency surgery.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIncisional hernia is the most frequently seen long term complication after laparotomy causing much morbidity and even mortality. The overall incidence remains 11-20%, despite studies attempting to optimize closing techniques. Two patient groups, patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm and obese patients, have a risk for incisional hernia after laparotomy of more than 30%. These patients might benefit from mesh augmented midline closure as a means to reduce incisional hernia incidence. METHODS/
designThe PRImary Mesh Closure of Abdominal Midline Wound (PRIMA) trial is a double-blinded international multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing running slowly absorbable suture closure with the same closure augmented with a sublay or onlay mesh. Primary endpoint will be incisional hernia incidence 2 years postoperatively. Secondary outcomes will be postoperative complications, pain, quality of life and cost effectiveness.A total of 460 patients will be included in three arms of the study and randomized between running suture closure, onlay mesh closure or sublay mesh closure. Follow-up will be at 1, 3, 12 and 24 months with ultrasound imaging performed at 6 and 24 months to objectify the presence of incisional hernia. Patients, investigators and radiologists will be blinded throughout the whole follow up. DISCCUSION: The use of prosthetic mesh has proven effective and safe in incisional hernia surgery however its use in a prophylactic manner has yet to be properly investigated. The PRIMA trial will provide level 1b evidence whether mesh augmented midline abdominal closure reduces incisional hernia incidence in high risk groups.
trial registrationClinical trial.gov NCT00761475.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.