Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24499039›Full record

ReviewJournal of athletic training

National Athletic Trainers' Association position statement: Preparticipation physical examinations and disqualifying conditions.

Kevin M Conley, Delmas J Bolin, Peter J Carek, Jeff G Konin, Timothy L Neal, Danielle Violette

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of athletic training. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 29 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Descriptive Analysis of Mental and Physical Wellness in Collegiate Dancers.Journal of dance medicine & science : official publication of the International Association for Dance Medicine & Science · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Movement Competency Screen: Rethinking the Rating.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kevin M ConleyUniversity of Pittsburgh, PA.
Delmas J Bolin
Peter J Carek
Jeff G Konin
Timothy L Neal
Danielle Violette

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo present athletic trainers with recommendations for the content and administration of the preparticipation physical examination (PPE) as well as considerations for determining safe participation in sports and identifying disqualifying conditions.

backgroundPreparticipation physical examinations have been used routinely for nearly 40 years. However, considerable debate exists as to their efficacy due to the lack of standardization in the process and the lack of conformity in the information that is gathered. With the continuing rise in sports participation at all levels and the growing number of reported cases of sudden death in organized athletics, the sports medicine community should consider adopting a standardized process for conducting the PPE to protect all parties. RECOMMENDATIONS: Recommendations are provided to equip the sports medicine community with the tools necessary to conduct the PPE as effectively and efficiently as possible using available scientific evidence and best practices. In addition, the recommendations will help clinicians identify those conditions that may threaten the health and safety of participants in organized sports, may require further evaluation and intervention, or may result in potential disqualification.

Indexed as

Guidelines as TopicSocietiesSports MedicineAthletic InjuriesHumansPhysical ExaminationSports

Identifiers

PMID24499039
PMCPMC3917287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.