ArticleBMC genomics2014
ComPlEx: conservation and divergence of co-expression networks in A. thaliana, Populus and O. sativa.
Article in BMC genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- The value of Arabidopsis as a model for secondary xylem research.The New phytologist · 2026Review
- Comparative regulomics of wood formation across dicot and conifer trees.Nature communications · 2026Article
- A Survey of the Transcriptomic Resources in Durum Wheat: Stress Responses, Data Integration and Exploitation.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Identification of growth regulators using cross-species network analysis in plants.Plant physiology · 2022Article
- Gene Co-expression Network Analysis and Linking Modules to Phenotyping Response in Plants.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- qtlXplorer: an online systems genetics browser in the Eucalyptus Genome Integrative Explorer (EucGenIE).BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Landscape of the Dark Transcriptome Revealed Through Re-mining Massive RNA-Seq Data.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Comparative Analyses of Gene Co-expression Networks: Implementations and Applications in the Study of Evolution.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
- The Road to Resistance in Forest Trees.Frontiers in plant science · 2019Review
- Data Integration in Poplar: 'Omics Layers and Integration Strategies.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Review
- Cyberinfrastructure to Improve Forest Health and Productivity: The Role of Tree Databases in Connecting Genomes, Phenomes, and the Environment.Frontiers in plant science · 2019Article
- Comparing time series transcriptome data between plants using a network module finding algorithm.Plant methods · 2019Article
- Multilevel comparative bioinformatics to investigate evolutionary relationships and specificities in gene annotations: an example for tomato and grapevine.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Species-specific transcriptomic network inference of interspecies interactions.The ISME journal · 2018Article
- CoNekT: an open-source framework for comparative genomic and transcriptomic network analyses.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- Towards a Dynamic Interaction Network of Life to unify and expand the evolutionary theory.BMC biology · 2018Review
- Co-expression and Transcriptome Analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2018Article
- NorWood: a gene expression resource for evo-devo studies of conifer wood development.The New phytologist · 2017Article
- AspWood: High-Spatial-Resolution Transcriptome Profiles Reveal Uncharacterized Modularity of Wood Formation inThe Plant cell · 2017Article
- Tissue and cell-type co-expression networks of transcription factors and wood component genes in Populus trichocarpa.Planta · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDivergence in gene regulation has emerged as a key mechanism underlying species differentiation. Comparative analysis of co-expression networks across species can reveal conservation and divergence in the regulation of genes.
resultsWe inferred co-expression networks of A. thaliana, Populus spp. and O. sativa using state-of-the-art methods based on mutual information and context likelihood of relatedness, and conducted a comprehensive comparison of these networks across a range of co-expression thresholds. In addition to quantifying gene-gene link and network neighbourhood conservation, we also applied recent advancements in network analysis to do cross-species comparisons of network properties such as scale free characteristics and gene centrality as well as network motifs. We found that in all species the networks emerged as scale free only above a certain co-expression threshold, and that the high-centrality genes upholding this organization tended to be conserved. Network motifs, in particular the feed-forward loop, were found to be significantly enriched in specific functional subnetworks but where much less conserved across species than gene centrality. Although individual gene-gene co-expression had massively diverged, up to ~80% of the genes still had a significantly conserved network neighbourhood. For genes with multiple predicted orthologs, about half had one ortholog with conserved regulation and another ortholog with diverged or non-conserved regulation. Furthermore, the most sequence similar ortholog was not the one with the most conserved gene regulation in over half of the cases.
conclusionsWe have provided a comprehensive analysis of gene regulation evolution in plants and built a web tool for Comparative analysis of Plant co-Expression networks (ComPlEx, http://complex.plantgenie.org/). The tool can be particularly useful for identifying the ortholog with the most conserved regulation among several sequence-similar alternatives and can thus be of practical importance in e.g. finding candidate genes for perturbation experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.