ArticleBiochemistry2014
Aggregation gatekeeper and controlled assembly of Trpzip β-hairpins.
Article in Biochemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating the Site-Specific Impact of Fluorine Substitution on Aromatic Interactions in a Tryptophan Zipper Peptide.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
- Streamlined Identification of Metallopeptides for Intracellular Catalysis Using Positionally Addressable Combinatorial Libraries.ACS catalysis · 2025Article
- N-glycosylation as a eukaryotic protective mechanism against protein aggregation.Science advances · 2024Article
- Hierarchical assembly of tryptophan zipper peptides into stress-relaxing bioactive hydrogels.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Autonomous aggregation suppression by acidic residues explains why chaperones favour basic residues.The EMBO journal · 2020Article
- Vibrational Approach to the Dynamics and Structure of Protein Amyloids.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein and peptide aggregation is an important issue both in vivo and in vitro. Herein, we examine the aggregation behaviors of two well-studied β-hairpins, Trpzip1 and Trpzip2. Previous studies suggested that Trpzip2 remains monomeric up to a concentration of ~15 mM whereas Trpzip1 readily aggregates at micromolar concentrations at acidic or neutral pH. This disparity is puzzling considering that these two peptides differ only in their turn sequences (i.e., GN vs NG). We hypothesize that these peptides can aggregate from their folded states via native edge-to-edge interactions and that the Lys8 residue in Trpzip2 is a more effective aggregation gatekeeper, because of a more favorable orientation. In support of this hypothesis, we find that increasing the pH to 13 or replacing Lys8 with a hydrophobic and photolabile Lys analogue, Lys(nvoc), leads to a significant increase in the aggregation propensity of Trpzip2, and that the aggregation of this Trpzip2 mutant can be reversed upon restoring the native Lys side chain via photocleavage of the nvoc moiety. In addition, we find that while both Trpzip1 and Trpzip2 form parallel β-sheet aggregates, the Lys(nvoc) Trpzip2 mutant forms antiparallel β-sheets and more stable fibrils. Taken together, these findings provide another example showing how sensitive peptide and protein aggregation is to minor sequence variation and that it is possible to use a photolabile non-natural amino acid, such as Lys(nvoc), to tune the rate of peptide aggregation and to control fibrillar structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.