Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24498423›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Human FXR regulates SHP expression through direct binding to an LRH-1 binding site, independent of an IR-1 and LRH-1.

Martijn O Hoeke, Janette Heegsma, Mark Hoekstra, Han Moshage, Klaas Nico Faber

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. FXR Friend-ChIPs in the Enterohepatic System.Seminars in liver disease · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martijn O HoekeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Janette HeegsmaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Mark HoekstraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Han MoshageDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Klaas Nico FaberDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFarnesoid X receptor/retinoid X receptor-alpha (FXR/RXRα) is the master transcriptional regulator of bile salt synthesis and transport in liver and intestine. FXR is activated by bile acids, RXRα by the vitamin A-derivative 9-cis retinoic acid (9cRA). Remarkably, 9cRA inhibits binding of FXR/RXRα to its response element, an inverted repeat-1 (IR-1). Still, most FXR/RXRα target genes are maximally expressed in the presence of both ligands, including the small heterodimer partner (SHP). Here, we revisited the FXR/RXRα-mediated regulation of human SHP.

methodsA 579-bp hSHP promoter element was analyzed to locate FXR/chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA)- and RXRα/9cRA-responsive elements. hSHP promoter constructs were analyzed in FXR/RXRα-transfected DLD-1, HEK293 and HepG2 cells exposed to CDCA, GW4064 (synthetic FXR ligand) and/or 9cRA. FXR-DNA interactions were analyzed by in vitro pull down assays.

resultshSHP promoter elements lacking the previously identified IR-1 (-291/-279) largely maintained their activation by FXR/CDCA, but were unresponsive to 9cRA. FXR-mediated activation of the hSHP promoter was primarily dependent on the -122/-69 region. Pull down assays revealed a direct binding of FXR to the -122/-69 sequence, which was abrogated by site-specific mutations in a binding site for the liver receptor homolog-1 (LRH-1) at -78/-70. These mutations strongly impaired the FXR/CDCA-mediated activation, even in the context of a hSHP promoter containing the IR-1. LRH-1 did not increase FXR/RXRα-mediated activation of hSHP promoter activity.

conclusionFXR/CDCA-activated expression of SHP is primarily mediated through direct binding to an LRH-1 binding site, which is not modulated by LRH-1 and unresponsive to 9cRA. 9cRA-induced expression of SHP requires the IR-1 that overlaps with a direct repeat-2 (DR-2) and DR-4. This establishes for the first time a co-stimulatory, but independent, action of FXR and RXRα agonists.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationBinding SitesBlotting, WesternHEK293 CellsHep G2 CellsHumansImmunoprecipitationInverted Repeat SequencesLuciferasesMutagenesis, Site-DirectedMutationPromoter Regions, GeneticReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearResponse ElementsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionFXR1 protein, humanLuciferasesNR5A2 protein, humannuclear receptor subfamily 0, group B, member 2Receptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID24498423
PMCPMC3912179
OpenAlexW2024298701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.