Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24498371›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

High degree of overlap between responses to a virus and to the house dust mite allergen in airway epithelial cells.

Korneliusz Golebski, Silvia Luiten, Danielle van Egmond, Esther de Groot, Kristina Irene Lisolette Röschmann, Wytske Johanna Fokkens, Cornelis Maria van Drunen

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Korneliusz GolebskiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Silvia LuitenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Danielle van EgmondDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Esther de GrootDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Kristina Irene Lisolette RöschmannDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Wytske Johanna FokkensDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Cornelis Maria van DrunenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Academic Medical Center · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAirway epithelium is widely considered to play an active role in immune responses through its ability to detect changes in the environment and to generate a microenvironment for immune competent cells. Therefore, besides its role as a physical barrier, epithelium affects the outcome of the immune response by the production of various pro-inflammatory mediators.

methodsWe stimulated airway epithelial cells with viral double stranded RNA analogue poly(I:C) or with house dust mite in a time course of 24 hours. In order to determine cytokines production by stimulated cells, we performed multiplex enzyme linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA).

resultsWe demonstrate that the temporal pattern of the genes that respond to virus exposure in airway epithelium resembles to a significant degree their pattern of response to HDM. The gene expression pattern of EGR1, DUSP1, FOSL1, JUN, MYC, and IL6 is rather similar after viral (poly(I:C)) and HDM exposure. However, both triggers also induce a specific response (e.g. ATF3, FOS, and NFKB1). We confirmed these data by showing that epithelial cells produce a variety of similar mediators in response to both poly(I:C) and HDM challenge (IL1-RA, IL-17, IFN-α and MIP1-α), sometimes with a quantitative difference in response (IL2-R, IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1, MIG, and HGF). Interestingly, only four mediators (IL-12, IP-10, RANTES and VEGF) where up-regulated specifically by poly(I:C) and not by HDM. Additionally, we report that pre-exposure to HDM deregulates production of cytokines and mediators in response to poly(I:C).

conclusionsEpithelial cells responses to the HDM-allergen and a virus strongly resemble both in gene expression and in protein level explaining why these two responses may affect each other.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, DermatophagoidesAntiviral AgentsBiomarkersCells, CulturedCytokinesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayEpithelial CellsHumansMicePoly I-CReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRespiratory MucosaReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, MessengerAntigens, DermatophagoidesAntiviral AgentsBiomarkersCytokinesPoly I-CRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID24498371
PMCPMC3912021
OpenAlexW2073327865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.