Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24498270›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Holsteins favor heifers, not bulls: biased milk production programmed during pregnancy as a function of fetal sex.

Katie Hinde, Abigail J Carpenter, John S Clay, Barry J Bradford

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
30.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Livestock species as emerging models for genomic imprinting.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Sex differences in preterm nutrition and growth: the evidence from human milk associated studies.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Bias of Calf Sex on Milk Yield and Fat Yield in Holstein Crossbreed Cows.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  17. Maternal Nutrition and Developmental Programming of Male Progeny.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Benefits and Risks of Preventing Twin Pregnancies.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katie HindeDepartment of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America ; Nutrition Laboratory, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America ; Brain, Mind, and Behavior Unit, California National Primate Research Center, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Abigail J CarpenterDepartment of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, United States of America.
John S ClayDairy Records Management Systems, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
Barry J BradfordDepartment of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, United States of America.
Kansas State University · USDairy Management · USHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mammalian females pay high energetic costs for reproduction, the greatest of which is imposed by lactation. The synthesis of milk requires, in part, the mobilization of bodily reserves to nourish developing young. Numerous hypotheses have been advanced to predict how mothers will differentially invest in sons and daughters, however few studies have addressed sex-biased milk synthesis. Here we leverage the dairy cow model to investigate such phenomena. Using 2.39 million lactation records from 1.49 million dairy cows, we demonstrate that the sex of the fetus influences the capacity of the mammary gland to synthesize milk during lactation. Cows favor daughters, producing significantly more milk for daughters than for sons across lactation. Using a sub-sample of this dataset (N = 113,750 subjects) we further demonstrate that the effects of fetal sex interact dynamically across parities, whereby the sex of the fetus being gestated can enhance or diminish the production of milk during an established lactation. Moreover the sex of the fetus gestated on the first parity has persistent consequences for milk synthesis on the subsequent parity. Specifically, gestation of a daughter on the first parity increases milk production by ∼ 445 kg over the first two lactations. Our results identify a dramatic and sustained programming of mammary function by offspring in utero. Nutritional and endocrine conditions in utero are known to have pronounced and long-term effects on progeny, but the ways in which the progeny has sustained physiological effects on the dam have received little attention to date.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleFemaleLactationMaleMammary Glands, AnimalMilkParityPregnancyReproductionSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID24498270
PMCPMC3911898
OpenAlexW2105176668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.