Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24498142›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2014

A history of abuse and operative delivery--results from a European multi-country cohort study.

Berit Schei, Mirjam Lukasse, Elsa Lena Ryding, Jacquelyn Campbell, Helle Karro, Hildur Kristjansdottir, Made Laanpere, Anne-Mette Schroll, Ann Tabor, Marleen Temmerman and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. History of violence and subjective health of mother and child.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Berit ScheiDepartment of Public Health and General Practice, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St.Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Mirjam LukasseDepartment of Public Health and General Practice, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway ; Department of Health, Nutrition and Management, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Elsa Lena RydingDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Karolinska Institutet/University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jacquelyn CampbellJohn Hopkins University, School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Helle KarroDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Hildur KristjansdottirDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland ; Directorate of Health, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Made LaanpereDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Anne-Mette SchrollCentre of Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ann TaborCentre of Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark ; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Marleen TemmermanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
An-Sofie Van ParysDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Anne-Marie WangelMalmö University, Faculty of Health and Society, Malmö, Sweden.
Thora SteingrimsdottirDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland ; Primary Health Care of the Capital Area, Centre of Development, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Ghent University Hospital · BEUniversity of Tartu · EECopenhagen University Hospital · DKDirectorate of Health · ISKarolinska Institutet · SEMalmö University · SENational University Hospital of Iceland · ISNorwegian University of Science and Technology · NORigshospitalet · DKSt Olav's University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe main aim of this study was to assess whether a history of abuse, reported during pregnancy, was associated with an operative delivery. Secondly, we assessed if the association varied according to the type of abuse and if the reported abuse had been experienced as a child or an adult.

designThe Bidens study, a cohort study in six European countries (Belgium, Iceland, Denmark, Estonia, Norway, and Sweden) recruited 6724 pregnant women attending routine antenatal care. History of abuse was assessed through questionnaire and linked to obstetric information from hospital records. The main outcome measure was operative delivery as a dichotomous variable, and categorized as an elective caesarean section (CS), or an operative vaginal birth, or an emergency CS. Non-obstetrically indicated were CSs performed on request or for psychological reasons without another medical reason. Binary and multinomial regression analysis were used to assess the associations.

resultsAmong 3308 primiparous women, sexual abuse as an adult (≥ 18 years) increased the risk of an elective CS, Adjusted Odds Ratio 2.12 (1.28-3.49), and the likelihood for a non-obstetrically indicated CS, OR 3.74 (1.24-11.24). Women expressing current suffering from the reported adult sexual abuse had the highest risk for an elective CS, AOR 4.07 (1.46-11.3). Neither physical abuse (in adulthood or childhood <18 years), nor sexual abuse in childhood increased the risk of any operative delivery among primiparous women. Among 3416 multiparous women, neither sexual, nor emotional abuse was significantly associated with any kind of operative delivery, while physical abuse had an increased AOR for emergency CS of 1.51 (1.05-2.19).

conclusionSexual abuse as an adult increases the risk of an elective CS among women with no prior birth experience, in particular for non-obstetrical reasons. Among multiparous women, a history of physical abuse increases the risk of an emergency CS.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionEmergency Medical ServicesMedical RecordsSex OffensesAdultEuropean UnionFemaleHumansPregnancyRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID24498142
PMCPMC3909197
OpenAlexW1982100065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.