Trial reportPloS one2014
Diagnosis of breast masses from dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR: a machine learning approach.
Trial report in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Diagnostic accuracy of machine learning-based magnetic resonance imaging models in breast cancer classification: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Towards clinical application of image mining: a systematic review on artificial intelligence and radiomics.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019Pooled it
- Can apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) distinguish breast cancer from benign breast findings? A meta-analysis based on 13 847 lesions.BMC cancer · 2019Pooled it
- Application of machine learning based on habitat imaging and vision transformer to predict treatment response of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma following neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy: a multi-center study.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Machine learning and new insights for breast cancer diagnosis.The Journal of international medical research · 2024Review
- Automated breast lesion localisation in microwave imaging employing simplified pulse coupled neural network.PloS one · 2022Article
- A Pipelined Tracer-Aware Approach for Lesion Segmentation in Breast DCE-MRI.Journal of imaging · 2021Article
- Radiomics and Machine Learning with Multiparametric Breast MRI for Improved Diagnostic Accuracy in Breast Cancer Diagnosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Role of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Interventional Oncology.Current oncology reports · 2021Review
- Machine learning in breast MRI.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2020Review
- Radiomics in Breast Imaging from Techniques to Clinical Applications: A Review.Korean journal of radiology · 2020Review
- Should We Ignore, Follow, or Biopsy? Impact of Artificial Intelligence Decision Support on Breast Ultrasound Lesion Assessment.AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2020Article
- Development and interpretation of a pathomics-based model for the prediction of microsatellite instability in Colorectal Cancer.Theranostics · 2020Article
- A radiomic nomogram based on an apparent diffusion coefficient map for differential diagnosis of suspicious breast findings.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2018Article
- [Diffusion-weighted imaging texture features in differentiation of malignant from benign nonpalpable breast lesions for patients with microcalcifications-only in mammography].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2018Article
- Heterogeneity of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Tumours and the Surrounding Stroma for Prediction of Ki-67 Proliferation Status in Breast Cancer.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Integrated radiomic framework for breast cancer and tumor biology using advanced machine learning and multiparametric MRI.NPJ breast cancer · 2017Article
- DCE-MRI, DW-MRI, and MRS in Cancer: Challenges and Advantages of Implementing Qualitative and Quantitative Multi-parametric Imaging in the Clinic.Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI · 2016Review
- Discrimination of Breast Cancer with Microcalcifications on Mammography by Deep Learning.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Radiomics: a new application from established techniques.Expert review of precision medicine and drug development · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) is increasingly used for breast cancer diagnosis as supplementary to conventional imaging techniques. Combining of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of morphology and kinetic features from DCE-MRI to improve the discrimination power of malignant from benign breast masses is rarely reported. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe study comprised of 234 female patients with 85 benign and 149 malignant lesions. Four distinct groups of features, coupling with pathological tests, were estimated to comprehensively characterize the pictorial properties of each lesion, which was obtained by a semi-automated segmentation method. Classical machine learning scheme including feature subset selection and various classification schemes were employed to build prognostic model, which served as a foundation for evaluating the combined effects of the multi-sided features for predicting of the types of lesions. Various measurements including cross validation and receiver operating characteristics were used to quantify the diagnostic performances of each feature as well as their combination.
resultsSeven features were all found to be statistically different between the malignant and the benign groups and their combination has achieved the highest classification accuracy. The seven features include one pathological variable of age, one morphological variable of slope, three texture features of entropy, inverse difference and information correlation, one kinetic feature of SER and one DWI feature of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Together with the selected diagnostic features, various classical classification schemes were used to test their discrimination power through cross validation scheme. The averaged measurements of sensitivity, specificity, AUC and accuracy are 0.85, 0.89, 90.9% and 0.93, respectively.
conclusionMulti-sided variables which characterize the morphological, kinetic, pathological properties and DWI measurement of ADC can dramatically improve the discriminatory power of breast lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.