Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24498054›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Phosphatase complex Pph3/Psy2 is involved in regulation of efficient non-homologous end-joining pathway in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Katayoun Omidi, Mohsen Hooshyar, Matthew Jessulat, Bahram Samanfar, Megan Sanders, Daniel Burnside, Sylvain Pitre, Andrew Schoenrock, Jianhua Xu, Mohan Babu and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Lithium Chloride Sensitivity in Yeast and Regulation of Translation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mapping and identification of a potential candidate gene for a novel maturity locus, E10, in soybean.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katayoun OmidiDepartment of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada ; Ottawa Institute of Systems Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Mohsen HooshyarDepartment of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada ; Ottawa Institute of Systems Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Matthew JessulatDepartment of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada ; Department of Biochemistry, Research and Innovation Centre, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Bahram SamanfarDepartment of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada ; Ottawa Institute of Systems Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Megan SandersDepartment of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada ; Ottawa Institute of Systems Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Daniel BurnsideDepartment of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada ; Ottawa Institute of Systems Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Sylvain PitreDepartment of Computer Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Andrew SchoenrockDepartment of Computer Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Jianhua XuCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejian University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Mohan BabuDepartment of Biochemistry, Research and Innovation Centre, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Ashkan GolshaniDepartment of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada ; Ottawa Institute of Systems Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Carleton University · CAUniversity of Regina · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the main mechanisms for double stranded DNA break (DSB) repair is through the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway. Using plasmid and chromosomal repair assays, we showed that deletion mutant strains for interacting proteins Pph3p and Psy2p had reduced efficiencies in NHEJ. We further observed that this activity of Pph3p and Psy2p appeared linked to cell cycle Rad53p and Chk1p checkpoint proteins. Pph3/Psy2 is a phosphatase complex, which regulates recovery from the Rad53p DNA damage checkpoint. Overexpression of Chk1p checkpoint protein in a parallel pathway to Rad53p compensated for the deletion of PPH3 or PSY2 in a chromosomal repair assay. Double mutant strains Δpph3/Δchk1 and Δpsy2/Δchk1 showed additional reductions in the efficiency of plasmid repair, compared to both single deletions which is in agreement with the activity of Pph3p and Psy2p in a parallel pathway to Chk1p. Genetic interaction analyses also supported a role for Pph3p and Psy2p in DNA damage repair, the NHEJ pathway, as well as cell cycle progression. Collectively, we report that the activity of Pph3p and Psy2p further connects NHEJ repair to cell cycle progression.

Indexed as

DNA End-Joining RepairCell CycleCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 1Checkpoint Kinase 2DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedMultiprotein ComplexesMutationNuclear ProteinsPhosphoprotein PhosphatasesProtein BindingProtein Interaction MappingProtein KinasesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 1Checkpoint Kinase 2Multiprotein ComplexesNuclear ProteinsPhosphoprotein PhosphatasesPPH3 protein, S cerevisiaeProtein KinasesPsy2 protein, S cerevisiaeRAD53 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24498054
PMCPMC3909046
OpenAlexW2028404078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.