Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24497997›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Pharmacogenetic-based efavirenz dose modification: suggestions for an African population and the different CYP2B6 genotypes.

Jackson K Mukonzo, Joel S Owen, Jasper Ogwal-Okeng, Ronald B Kuteesa, Sarah Nanzigu, Nelson Sewankambo, Lehana Thabane, Lars L Gustafsson, Colin Ross, Eleni Aklillu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Research ethics · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. 'Research ethics · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Strategies for Implementation Research to Investigate the Negative Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Efavirenz and Dolutegravir.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
  15. Association ofPharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Influence ofPharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Jackson K MukonzoDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda ; CIHR, Canadian HIV Trials Network, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Joel S OwenSchool of Pharmacy, Union University, Jackson, Tennessee, United States of America.
Jasper Ogwal-OkengDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Ronald B KuteesaDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Sarah NanziguDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Nelson SewankamboDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Lehana ThabaneDepartments of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Pediatrics and Anaesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada ; Biostatistics Unit, St. Joseph's Healthcare-Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Lars L GustafssonDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital-Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Colin RossDivision of Translational Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Eleni AklilluDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital-Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Makerere University · UGKarolinska University Hospital · SEMcMaster University · CAUnion University · USUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharmacogenetics contributes to inter-individual variability in pharmacokinetics (PK) of efavirenz (EFV), leading to variations in both efficacy and toxicity. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of genetic factors on EFV pharmacokinetics, treatment outcomes and genotype based EFV dose recommendations for adult HIV-1 infected Ugandans.

methodsIn total, 556 steady-state plasma EFV concentrations from 99 HIV infected patients (64 female) treated with EFV/lamivudine/zidovidine were analyzed. Patient genotypes for CYP2B6 (*6 & *11), CYP3A5 (*3,*6 & *7) and ABCB1 c.4046A>G, baseline biochemistries and CD4 and viral load change from baseline were determined. A one-compartment population PK model with first-order absorption (NONMEM) was used to estimate genotype effects on EFV pharmacokinetics. PK simulations were performed based upon population genotype frequencies. Predicted AUCs were compared between the product label and simulations for doses of 300 mg, 450 mg, and 600 mg.

resultsEFV apparent clearance (CL/F) was 2.2 and 1.74 fold higher in CYP2B6*6 (*1/*1) and CYP2B6*6 (*1/*6) compared CYP2B6*6 (*6/*6) carriers, while a 22% increase in F1 was observed for carriers of ABCB1 c.4046A>G variant allele. Higher mean AUC was attained in CYP2B6 *6/*6 genotypes compared to CYP2B6 *1/*1 (p<0.0001). Simulation based AUCs for 600 mg doses were 1.25 and 2.10 times the product label mean AUC for the Ugandan population in general and CYP2B6*6/*6 genotypes respectively. Simulated exposures for EFV daily doses of 300 mg and 450 mg are comparable to the product label. Viral load fell precipitously on treatment, with only six patients having HIV RNA >40 copies/mL after 84 days of treatment. No trend with exposure was noted for these six patients.

conclusionResults of this study suggest that daily doses of 450 mg and 300 mg might meet the EFV treatment needs of HIV-1 infected Ugandans in general and individuals homozygous for CYP2B6*6 mutation, respectively.

Indexed as

AdultAlkynesArea Under CurveAryl Hydrocarbon HydroxylasesATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily BATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1BenzoxazinesCyclopropanesCytochrome P-450 CYP2B6Cytochrome P-450 CYP3ADose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGenotypeHIV InfectionsHumansABCB1 protein, humanAlkynesAryl Hydrocarbon HydroxylasesATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily BATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1BenzoxazinesCyclopropanesCYP2B6 protein, humanCYP3A5 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP2B6Cytochrome P-450 CYP3AefavirenzLamivudineReverse Transcriptase InhibitorsZidovudine

Identifiers

PMID24497997
PMCPMC3909010
OpenAlexW2059157689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.