Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24497583›Full record

Observational studyPeritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis

Outcomes of a peritoneal dialysis program in remote communities within Colombia.

Mauricio Sanabria, Martha Devia, Gilma Hernández, Kindar Astudillo, Carlos Trillos, Mauricio Uribe, Catalina Latorre, Astrid Bernal, Angela Rivera, Local investigators in study

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mauricio SanabriaBaxter RTS Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia; Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia; and Baxter Latin America, Bogotá, Colombia.
Martha DeviaBaxter RTS Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia; Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia; and Baxter Latin America, Bogotá, Colombia.
Gilma HernándezBaxter RTS Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia; Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia; and Baxter Latin America, Bogotá, Colombia.
Kindar AstudilloBaxter RTS Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia; Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia; and Baxter Latin America, Bogotá, Colombia.
Carlos TrillosBaxter RTS Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia; Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia; and Baxter Latin America, Bogotá, Colombia.
Mauricio UribeBaxter RTS Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia; Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia; and Baxter Latin America, Bogotá, Colombia.
Catalina LatorreBaxter RTS Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia; Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia; and Baxter Latin America, Bogotá, Colombia.
Astrid BernalBaxter RTS Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia; Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia; and Baxter Latin America, Bogotá, Colombia.
Angela RiveraBaxter RTS Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia; Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia; and Baxter Latin America, Bogotá, Colombia.
Local investigators in study

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveColombia is a country of diverse geographic regions, some with mountainous terrain that can make access to urban areas difficult for individuals who live in remote areas. In 2005, a program was initiated to establish remote peritoneal dialysis (PD) centers in Colombia to improve access to PD for patients with end-stage renal disease who face geographic or financial access barriers. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe present study was a multi-center cohort observational study of prevalent home PD patients who were at least 18 years of age and were being managed by one of nine established remote PD centers in Colombia over a 2-year period. Data were collected from clinical records, databases, and patient interviews. Patient survival, incidence of peritonitis, and rate of withdrawal from PD therapy were assessed.

resultsA total of 345 patients were eligible for the study. The majority (87.8%) of patients lived on one to two times a minimum monthly salary (equivalent to US$243 - US$486). On average, patients traveled 1.2 hours and 4.3 hours from their home to their remote PD center or an urban reference renal clinic, respectively. The incidence rate of peritonitis was 2.54 episodes per 100 patient-months of therapy. A bivariate analysis showed a significantly higher risk of peritonitis in patients who were living on less than one times a monthly minimum salary (p < 0.05) or who had a dirt, cement, or unfinished wood floor (p < 0.05). The 1-year and 2-year patient survival rates were 92.44% and 81.55%, respectively. The 1-year and 2-year technique survival rates were 97.27% and 89.78%, respectively.

conclusionsWith the support of remote PD centers that mitigate geographic and financial barriers to healthcare, home PD therapy is a safe and appropriate treatment option for patients who live in remote areas in Colombia.

Indexed as

Hemodialysis Units, HospitalTransportation of PatientsAdultCohort StudiesColombiaConfidence IntervalsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedPeritoneal DialysisPeritoneal Dialysis, Continuous AmbulatoryPeritonitisColombiainfectionperitoneal dialysisremote dialysis centersurvival

Identifiers

PMID24497583
PMCPMC4335928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.