Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24497372›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2014

Interventions at caesarean section for reducing the risk of aspiration pneumonitis.

Shantini Paranjothy, James D Griffiths, Hannah K Broughton, Gillian M L Gyte, Heather C Brown, Jane Thomas

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02960113 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Is the Application of Scopolamine Patch With or Without Intra-operative Acupressure Point P6 Stimulation More Effective Than Intra-operative Acupressure Point P6 Stimulation Alone?

TypeinterventionalSponsorRutgers, The State University of New JerseyRan2016 to 2021Enrolled240ConditionsNausea, Vomiting, SatisfactionArmsscopolamine patch, acupressure point P6
NCT06793267 phase3not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Ultrasonoraphic Asessment of Metoclopramide Effect on Gastric Volume in Urgent Surgical Trauma Pediateric Patients. Randomozed Controlled Double Blind Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled70ConditionsGastric VolumeArmsMetoclopramide (Maxolon), Saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Airway management in the obstetric patient: management strategyRevista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Shantini ParanjothyCochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
James D Griffiths
Hannah K Broughton
Gillian M L Gyte
Heather C Brown
Jane Thomas
Cochrane · GBCardiff University · GBRoyal Sussex County Hospital · GBRoyal Women's Hospital · AUUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAspiration pneumonitis is a syndrome resulting from the inhalation of gastric contents. The incidence in obstetric anaesthesia has fallen, largely due to improved anaesthetic techniques and the increased use of regional anaesthesia at caesarean section. However, aspiration pneumonitis is still a cause of maternal morbidity and mortality, and it is important to use effective prophylaxis.

objectivesTo determine whether interventions given prior to caesarean section reduce the risk of aspiration pneumonitis in women with an uncomplicated pregnancy. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 April 2013). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials were included. Quasi-randomised trials were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Review authors independently assessed the studies for inclusion, assessed risk of bias and carried out data extraction. Data entry was checked. Fixed-effect meta-analysis was used to combine data where it was reasonable to assume that studies were estimating the same underlying treatment effect. If substantial clinical or statistical heterogeneity was detected, we used random-effects analysis to produce an overall summary. MAIN

resultsThirty-two studies were included in this review. However, only 22 studies, involving 2658 women, provided data for analysis. All the women in the included studies had a caesarean section under general anaesthesia. The studies covered a number of comparisons, but were mostly small and of unclear or poor quality.When compared with no treatment or placebo, there was a significant reduction in the risk of intragastric pH < 2.5 with antacids (risk ratio (RR) 0.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.09 to 0.32, two studies, 108 women), H2 antagonists (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.18, two studies, 170 women) and proton pump antagonists (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.46, one study 80 women). H2 antagonists were associated with a reduced the risk of intragastric pH < 2.5 at intubation when compared with proton pump antagonists (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.97, one study, 120 women), but compared with antacids the findings were unclear. The combined use of 'antacids plus H2 antagonists' was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of intragastric pH < 2.5 at intubation when compared with placebo (RR 0.02, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.15, one study, 89 women) or compared with antacids alone (RR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.92, one study, 119 women). AUTHORS'

conclusionsThe quality of the evidence was poor, but the findings suggest that the combination of antacids plus H2 antagonists was more effective than no intervention, and superior to antacids alone in preventing low gastric pH. However, none of the studies assessed potential adverse effects or substantive clinical outcomes. These findings are relevant for all women undergoing caesarean section under general anaesthesia.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionAnesthesia, GeneralAnesthesia, ObstetricalAntacidsAntiemeticsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHistamine H2 AntagonistsHumansMetoclopramidePneumonia, AspirationPregnancyProton Pump InhibitorsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntacidsAntiemeticsHistamine H2 AntagonistsMetoclopramideProton Pump Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID24497372
PMCPMC10789485
OpenAlexW1806766303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.