Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24496965›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2014

Cardiac regeneration in model organisms.

Laurent Gamba, Michael Harrison, Ching-Ling Lien

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Gene Therapy for Heart Failure.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. leptin b and its regeneration enhancer illustrate the regenerative features of zebrafish hearts.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Apical Resection and Cryoinjury of Neonatal Mouse Heart.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Cardiac telocytes exist in the adult Xenopus tropicalis heart.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2020
    Article
  18. Stage-dependent cardiac regeneration inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laurent GambaSaban Research Institute and Heart Institute,Children's Hospital Los Angeles, 4650 Sunset Blvd. MS#137, Los Angeles, CA, 90027, USA.
Michael Harrison
Ching-Ling Lien

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms of Zebrafish Heart RegenerationR01HL096121 · NHLBI · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES · PI LIEN, CHING-LING E · 2010 to 2014
$2.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL096121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementMyocardial infarction is the most common cause of cardiac injury in humans and results in acute loss of large numbers of myocardial cells. Unfortunately, the mammalian heart is unable to replenish the cells that are lost following a myocardial infarction and an eventual progression to heart failure can often occur as a result. Regenerative medicine based approaches are actively being developed; however, a complete blueprint on how mammalian hearts can regenerate is still missing. Knowledge gained from studying animal models, such as zebrafish, newt, and neonatal mice, that can naturally regenerate their hearts after injury have provided an understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in heart repair and regeneration. This research offers novel strategies to overcome the limited regenerative response observed in human patients.

Identifiers

PMID24496965
PMCPMC4100912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.