ArticlemBio2014
Laser optical sensor, a label-free on-plate Salmonella enterica colony detection tool.
Article in mBio, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Identifying antibiotic-resistant strains via cell sorting and elastic-light-scatter phenotyping.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Article
- On-Site Fluorescent Detection of Sepsis-Inducing Bacteria using a Graphene-Oxide CRISPR-Cas12a (GO-CRISPR) System.Analytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Simple Imaging System for Label-Free Identification of Bacterial Pathogens in Resource-Limited Settings.International journal of biomedical imaging · 2024Article
- Engineered Cell Line Imaging Assay Differentiates Pathogenic from Non-Pathogenic Bacteria.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Petri-plate, bacteria, and laser optical scattering sensor.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Review
- Advancement inBiosensors · 2021Review
- Advances in Optical Detection of Human-Associated Pathogenic Bacteria.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Mammalian Cell-Based Immunoassay for Detection of Viable Bacterial Pathogens.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Tunicamycin Mediated Inhibition of Wall Teichoic Acid AffectsFrontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- Angular photodiode array-based device to detect bacterial pathogens in a wound model.IEEE sensors journal · 2017Article
- Mie scatter spectra-based device for instant, contact-free, and specific diagnosis of bacterial skin infection.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Virulence Gene-Associated Mutant Bacterial Colonies Generate Differentiating Two-Dimensional Laser Scatter Fingerprints.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2016Article
- The effect of a novel low temperature-short time (LTST) process to extend the shelf-life of fluid milk.SpringerPlus · 2016Article
- Optical scatter patterns facilitate rapid differentiation of Enterobacteriaceae on CHROMagar™ Orientation medium.Microbial biotechnology · 2016Article
- Novel PCR Assays Complement Laser Biosensor-Based Method and Facilitate Listeria Species Detection from Food.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015Article
- Classification of foodborne pathogens using near infrared (NIR) laser scatter imaging system with multivariate calibration.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Streptomycin Induced Stress Response in Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Shows Distinct Colony Scatter Signature.PloS one · 2015Article
- Laser-induced speckle scatter patterns in Bacillus colonies.Frontiers in microbiology · 2014Article
- Light scattering sensor for direct identification of colonies of Escherichia coli serogroups O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, O145 and O157.PloS one · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
unlabelledWe investigated the application capabilities of a laser optical sensor, BARDOT (bacterial rapid detection using optical scatter technology) to generate differentiating scatter patterns for the 20 most frequently reported serovars of Salmonella enterica. Initially, the study tested the classification ability of BARDOT by using six Salmonella serovars grown on brain heart infusion, brilliant green, xylose lysine deoxycholate, and xylose lysine tergitol 4 (XLT4) agar plates. Highly accurate discrimination (95.9%) was obtained by using scatter signatures collected from colonies grown on XLT4. Further verification used a total of 36 serovars (the top 20 plus 16) comprising 123 strains with classification precision levels of 88 to 100%. The similarities between the optical phenotypes of strains analyzed by BARDOT were in general agreement with the genotypes analyzed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). BARDOT was evaluated for the real-time detection and identification of Salmonella colonies grown from inoculated (1.2 × 10(2) CFU/30 g) peanut butter, chicken breast, and spinach or from naturally contaminated meat. After a sequential enrichment in buffered peptone water and modified Rappaport Vassiliadis broth for 4 h each, followed by growth on XLT4 (~16 h), BARDOT detected S. Typhimurium with 84% accuracy in 24 h, returning results comparable to those of the USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service method, which requires ~72 h. BARDOT also detected Salmonella (90 to 100% accuracy) in the presence of background microbiota from naturally contaminated meat, verified by 16S rRNA sequencing and PFGE. Prolonged residence (28 days) of Salmonella in peanut butter did not affect the bacterial ability to form colonies with consistent optical phenotypes. This study shows BARDOT's potential for nondestructive and high-throughput detection of Salmonella in food samples. IMPORTANCE: High-throughput screening of food products for pathogens would have a significant impact on the reduction of food-borne hazards. A laser optical sensor was developed to screen pathogen colonies on an agar plate instantly without damaging the colonies; this method aids in early pathogen detection by the classical microbiological culture-based method. Here we demonstrate that this sensor was able to detect the 36 Salmonella serovars tested, including the top 20 serovars, and to identify isolates of the top 8 Salmonella serovars. Furthermore, it can detect Salmonella in food samples in the presence of background microbiota in 24 h, whereas the standard USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service method requires about 72 h.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.