ArticleJournal of structural and functional genomics2014
Principal components analysis of protein sequence clusters.
Article in Journal of structural and functional genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- PCA-Based Database Mining Enables the Discovery of Bacterial Carbene Transferases for Stereodivergent Cyclopropanation.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Article
- Principal Component and Structural Element Analysis Provide Insights into the Evolutionary Divergence of Conotoxins.Biology · 2022Article
- Pairwise sequence similarity mapping with PaSiMap: Reclassification of immunoglobulin domains from titin as case study.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- Structural basis of P[II] rotavirus evolution and host ranges under selection of histo-blood group antigens.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Principal Component Analysis Applications in COVID-19 Genome Sequence Studies.Cognitive computation · 2021Article
- Protein Structural Information and Evolutionary Landscape by In Vitro Evolution.Molecular biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Computational prediction of active sites and ligands in different AHL quorum quenching lactonases and acylases.Journal of biosciences · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sequence analysis of large protein families can produce sub-clusters even within the same family. In some cases, it is of interest to know precisely which amino acid position variations are most responsible for driving separation into sub-clusters. In large protein families composed of large proteins, it can be quite challenging to assign the relative importance to specific amino acid positions. Principal components analysis (PCA) is ideal for such a task, since the problem is posed in a large variable space, i.e. the number of amino acids that make up the protein sequence, and PCA is powerful at reducing the dimensionality of complex problems by projecting the data into an eigenspace that represents the directions of greatest variation. However, PCA of aligned protein sequence families is complicated by the fact that protein sequences are traditionally represented by single letter alphabetic codes, whereas PCA of protein sequence families requires conversion of sequence information into a numerical representation. Here, we introduce a new amino acid sequence conversion algorithm optimized for PCA data input. The method is demonstrated using a small artificial dataset to illustrate the characteristics and performance of the algorithm, as well as a small protein sequence family consisting of nine members, COG2263, and finally with a large protein sequence family, Pfam04237, which contains more than 1,800 sequences that group into two sub-clusters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.