Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24496619›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2014

Spontaneous hair cell regeneration in the neonatal mouse cochlea in vivo.

Brandon C Cox, Renjie Chai, Anne Lenoir, Zhiyong Liu, LingLi Zhang, Duc-Huy Nguyen, Kavita Chalasani, Katherine A Steigelman, Jie Fang, Edwin W Rubel and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 219 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
219citing papers in PubMed
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

219 citing papers in PubMed, 286 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Long-rangeProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

159 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Rubel, Edwin W [added]
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Brandon C CoxDepartment of Developmental Neurobiology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA.
Renjie Chai
Anne Lenoir
Zhiyong Liu
LingLi Zhang
Duc-Huy Nguyen
Kavita Chalasani
Katherine A Steigelman
Jie Fang
Edwin W Rubel
Alan G Cheng
Jian Zuo
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USStanford University · USSoutheast University · CN

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI GERARD PAUL ZAMBETTI · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
GENETIC ANALYSIS OF MAMMALIAN HEARING SENSITIVITYR01DC006471 · NIDCD · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI ZUO, JIAN · 2004 to 2013
$3.5M
Stanford OHNS Core CenterP30DC010363 · NIDCD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI RICCI, ANTHONY J · 2009 to 2016
$3.0M
Regulation of Inner Ear Stem CellsK08DC011043 · NIDCD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHENG, ALAN GI-LUN · 2010 to 2014
$1.1M
Generation of mice with inducible Cre expression in adult cochlear hair cellsR21DC008800 · NIDCD · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI ZUO, JIAN · 2007 to 2008
$410k
p16INK4a in Cochlear Hair Cell Regeneration.F32DC010310 · NIDCD · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI COX, BRANDON C. · 2009 to 2011
$151k
The Role of Pkd1 in Hair Cell Mechanotransduction ChannelsF31DC009393 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI STEIGELMAN, KATHERINE ANN · 2008 to 2009
$58k
NCI NIH HHS CA21765NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765NIDCD NIH HHS DC006471NIDCD NIH HHS DC008800NIDCD NIH HHS DC009393NIDCD NIH HHS DC010310NIDCD NIH HHS DC011043NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC009393NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC010310NIDCD NIH HHS K08 DC011043NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC010363NIDCD NIH HHS P30DC010363NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006471NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC008800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loss of cochlear hair cells in mammals is currently believed to be permanent, resulting in hearing impairment that affects more than 10% of the population. Here, we developed two genetic strategies to ablate neonatal mouse cochlear hair cells in vivo. Both Pou4f3(DTR/+) and Atoh1-CreER™; ROSA26(DTA/+) alleles allowed selective and inducible hair cell ablation. After hair cell loss was induced at birth, we observed spontaneous regeneration of hair cells. Fate-mapping experiments demonstrated that neighboring supporting cells acquired a hair cell fate, which increased in a basal to apical gradient, averaging over 120 regenerated hair cells per cochlea. The normally mitotically quiescent supporting cells proliferated after hair cell ablation. Concurrent fate mapping and labeling with mitotic tracers showed that regenerated hair cells were derived by both mitotic regeneration and direct transdifferentiation. Over time, regenerated hair cells followed a similar pattern of maturation to normal hair cell development, including the expression of prestin, a terminal differentiation marker of outer hair cells, although many new hair cells eventually died. Hair cell regeneration did not occur when ablation was induced at one week of age. Our findings demonstrate that the neonatal mouse cochlea is capable of spontaneous hair cell regeneration after damage in vivo. Thus, future studies on the neonatal cochlea might shed light on the competence of supporting cells to regenerate hair cells and on the factors that promote the survival of newly regenerated hair cells.

Indexed as

Animals, NewbornAnimalsAnion Transport ProteinsCell TransdifferentiationHair Cells, AuditoryMiceMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningMitosisRegenerationSulfate TransportersAnion Transport ProteinsSLC26A5 protein, humanSulfate TransportersAtoh1Diphtheria toxinDirect transdifferentiationFate mappingLgr5Mitotic regeneration

Identifiers

PMID24496619
PMCPMC3912828
OpenAlexW2156396097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.