Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24496175›Full record

ArticleJournal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism2014

The predictive power of brain mRNA mappings for in vivo protein density: a positron emission tomography correlation study.

Gaia Rizzo, Mattia Veronese, Rolf A Heckemann, Sudhakar Selvaraj, Oliver D Howes, Alexander Hammers, Federico E Turkheimer, Alessandra Bertoldo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Kinetic modelling of [Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2018
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Imaging of the glioma microenvironment by TSPO PET.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Multimodal partial volume correction: Application to [Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2017
    Article
  16. Review
  17. A High-Resolution In Vivo Atlas of the Human Brain's Serotonin System.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Gaia RizzoDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Mattia Veronese1] Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy [2] Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, London, UK.
Rolf A Heckemann1] Institute for Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden [2] MedTech West, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sudhakar SelvarajMRC Clinical Sciences Centre, Imperial College, London, UK.
Oliver D HowesInstitute of Psychiatry, King's College, London, UK.
Alexander HammersThe Neurodis Foundation, CERMEP Imagerie du Vivant, Lyon, France.
Federico E TurkheimerInstitute of Psychiatry, King's College, London, UK.
Alessandra BertoldoDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GBUniversity of Padua · ITFondation Neurodis · FRImperial College London · GBUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

Medical Research Council G0700995Medical Research Council G1100809Medical Research Council G1100809/1Medical Research Council G9901497Medical Research Council MC-A656-5QD30Medical Research Council MC_U120085814Medical Research Council MC_U120097115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substantial efforts are being spent on postmortem mRNA transcription mapping on the assumption that in vivo protein distribution can be predicted from such data. We tested this assumption by comparing mRNA transcription maps from the Allen Human Brain Atlas with reference protein concentration maps acquired with positron emission tomography (PET) in two representative systems of neurotransmission (opioid and serotoninergic). We found a tight correlation between mRNA expression and specific binding with 5-HT1A receptors measured with PET, but for opioid receptors, the correlation was weak. The discrepancy can be explained by differences in expression regulation between the two systems: transcriptional mechanisms dominate the regulation in the serotoninergic system, whereas in the opioid system proteins are further modulated after transcription. We conclude that mRNA information can be exploited for systems where translational mechanisms predominantly regulate expression. Where posttranscriptional mechanisms are important, mRNA data have to be interpreted with caution. The methodology developed here can be used for probing assumptions about the relationship of mRNA and protein in multiple neurotransmission systems.

Indexed as

AdultBrainBrain MappingCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPositron-Emission TomographyReceptor, Serotonin, 5-HT1AReceptors, OpioidRNA, MessengerTranscription, GeneticYoung AdultReceptor, Serotonin, 5-HT1AReceptors, OpioidRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID24496175
PMCPMC4013760
OpenAlexW2139137914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.