Trial reportMenopause (New York, N.Y.)2014
Effects of stellate ganglion block on vasomotor symptoms: findings from a randomized controlled clinical trial in postmenopausal women.
Trial report in Menopause (New York, N.Y.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of stellate ganglion block on perimenopausal hot flashes: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Trial
- Stellate ganglion blockade and verbal memory in midlife women: Evidence from a randomized trial.Maturitas · 2016Trial
- Advances in the clinical application of stellate ganglion block for non-pain indications.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Management of vasomotor symptoms in cancer patients.The oncologist · 2025Review
- The potential role of stellate ganglion block in impacting the central and peripheral systems: a narrative review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Menopausal vasomotor symptoms and plasma Alzheimer disease biomarkers.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2024Article
- Review
- Vasomotor Symptoms During Menopause: A Practical Guide on Current Treatments and Future Perspectives.International journal of women's health · 2023Review
- Menopause and Brain Health: Hormonal Changes Are Only Part of the Story.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Review
- Non-hormonal strategies for managing menopausal symptoms in cancer survivors: an update.Ecancermedicalscience · 2019Review
- The Management of Menopausal Symptoms in Women Following Breast Cancer: An Overview.Drugs & aging · 2018Article
- Comparison of the effects of stellate ganglion block and paroxetine on hot flashes and sleep disturbance in breast cancer survivors.Cancer management and research · 2018Article
- Management of Menopausal Symptoms.Obstetrics and gynecology · 2015Review
- Stellate Ganglion Block for the Treatment of Hot Flashes in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Literature Review.Ochsner journal · 2015Review
- Menopausal Hot Flashes: A Concise Review.Journal of mid-life healthReview
- Stellate ganglion block beyond chronic pain: A literature review on its application in painful and non-painful conditions.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacologyReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveUncontrolled intervention studies, including studies involving breast cancer survivors, have demonstrated improvements in vasomotor symptoms (VMS) after stellate ganglion blockade (SGB) with a local anesthetic. This study presents the first randomized sham-controlled trial of SGB for the treatment of VMS.
methodsParticipants included 40 postmenopausal women, aged 30 to 70 years, with moderate to severe VMS. The study was a randomized sham-controlled trial comparing the effects of SGB versus sham injection on the frequencies of total and moderate to severe VMS, as measured by daily diaries. Image-guided SGB was performed with 5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine. Sham injection of saline was performed in subcutaneous tissues in the neck. VMS were recorded at baseline and for 6 months thereafter. Objective VMS were recorded using ambulatory sternal skin conductance monitoring during a 24-hour period at baseline and on 3-month follow-up.
resultsThere were no significant group differences in overall VMS frequency, but the frequency of moderate to very severe VMS was reduced more in the active group compared with the sham treatment group (event rate ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.35-0.71; P < 0.001). The frequency of objective VMS was also reduced to a greater degree in the SGB group than in the sham group (event rate ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.64-0.99; P < 0.05). There were no study-related serious adverse events.
conclusionsSGB may provide effective treatment of VMS in women who seek nonhormonal treatments because of safety concerns and personal preference. The finding that SGB significantly reduces objectively measured VMS provides further evidence of efficacy. A larger trial is warranted to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.