Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24495505›Full record

ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2014

Chinese consensus statement on the evaluation and intervention of collateral circulation for ischemic stroke.

Li-Ping Liu, An-Ding Xu, Lawrence K S Wong, David Z Wang, Yong-Jun Wang, Expert consensus group of the evaluation & intervention of collateral circulation for ischemic stroke

Open access · hybridAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Li-Ping LiuDepartments of Neurology and Stroke Center, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
An-Ding Xu
Lawrence K S Wong
David Z Wang
Yong-Jun Wang
Expert consensus group of the evaluation & intervention of collateral circulation for ischemic stroke
Capital Medical University · CNChinese University of Hong Kong · HKFirst Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University · CNUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCollateral circulation is becoming more significant in the individual management strategy of ischemic stroke, there are more data updated recently.

aimTo make the further acknowledgment of the evaluation and how to improving collateral flow, for better treatment selection.

methodA panel of experts on stroke providing related statement based on review the results from most up-to-date clinical research.

resultsDSA is the gold standard in evaluating all levels of collaterals. CTA can be used for evaluating leptomeningeal collaterals, MRA for CoW, TCD or TCCS can be used as screening tool for primary evaluation. The treatment modalities include direct interventions, such as Extracranial-Intracranial bypass, and indirect interventions, as External counterpulsation and pressor therapy. The consideration of methodology to augment and improve can be considered on an individual basis. DISCUSSION: In this consensus, we interpret the definition, neuroimaging evaluation, intervention and potential strategy on collaterals in the future.

conclusionAssessment of collateral circulation is crucial for selecting therapeutic options, predicting infarction volume and making prognosis after ischemic stroke. Data is still needed to provide therapeutic evidence for many new developed technologies. Until more evidence is available, the clinical significance of applying the new technologies is unclear and perhaps limited.

Indexed as

ConsensusAsian PeopleBrain IschemiaCerebrovascular CirculationCollateral CirculationHumansStrokeCollateral circulationConsensusEvaluationInterventionIschemic stroke

Identifiers

PMID24495505
PMCPMC4233984
OpenAlexW2057615070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.