ArticleBMC genomics2014
Comparison of three next-generation sequencing platforms for metagenomic sequencing and identification of pathogens in blood.
Article in BMC genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
74 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metagenomic next-generation sequencing: new horizons in microbiology.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Current methods in the diagnosis of invasive meningococcal disease.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
- Next-Generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Consortium Approach to Genomic Surveillance.Emerging infectious diseases · 2024Article
- High-Throughput Sequencing Methods for the Detection of Two Strawberry Viruses in Post-Entry Quarantine.Viruses · 2024Article
- Competition mode and soil nutrient status shape the role of soil microbes in the diversity-invasibility relationship.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Virome profiling of fig wasps (Ceratosolen spp.) reveals virus diversity spanning four realms.Virology · 2024Article
- Analysis of microbiological profiles of Indian patients with peri-implantitis and periodontitis.Bioinformation · 2024Article
- Virus-pathogen interactions improve water quality along the Middle Route of the South-to-North Water Diversion Canal.The ISME journal · 2023Article
- Changes in nitrogen and phosphorus availability driven by secondary succession in temperate forests shape soil fungal communities and function.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Integrated multi-omic analyses provide insight into colon adenoma susceptibility modulation by the gut microbiota.mSystems · 2023Article
- Highly multiplexed targeted sequencing strategy for infectious disease surveillance.BMC biotechnology · 2023Article
- Microbial profiling of peri-implantitis compared to the periodontal microbiota in health and disease using 16S rRNA sequencing.Journal of periodontal & implant science · 2023Article
- Novel Virus Identification through Metagenomics: A Systematic Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Critical Assessment of Short-Read Assemblers for the Metagenomic Identification of Foodborne and Waterborne Pathogens Using Simulated Bacterial Communities.Microorganisms · 2022Article
- Polymerase chain reaction-based detection of coinfecting DNA viruses in Vietnamese pigs in 2017 and 2021.Veterinary world · 2022Article
- PathoLive-Real-Time Pathogen Identification from Metagenomic Illumina Datasets.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Performance of Next-Generation Sequencing Platforms.BioMed research international · 2022Review
- The evolution of bacterial genome assemblies - where do we need to go next?Microbiome research reports · 2022Article
- Comparison of traditional methods and high-throughput genetic sequencing in the detection of pathogens in pulmonary infectious diseases.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Rapid viral metagenomics using SMART-9N amplification and nanopore sequencing.Wellcome open research · 2021Article
14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe introduction of benchtop sequencers has made adoption of whole genome sequencing possible for a broader community of researchers than ever before. Concurrently, metagenomic sequencing (MGS) is rapidly emerging as a tool for interrogating complex samples that defy conventional analyses. In addition, next-generation sequencers are increasingly being used in clinical or related settings, for instance to track outbreaks. However, information regarding the analytical sensitivity or limit of detection (LoD) of benchtop sequencers is currently lacking. Furthermore, the specificity of sequence information at or near the LoD is unknown.
resultsIn the present study, we assess the ability of three next-generation sequencing platforms to identify a pathogen (viral or bacterial) present in low titers in a clinically relevant sample (blood). Our results indicate that the Roche-454 Titanium platform is capable of detecting Dengue virus at titers as low as 1X102.5 pfu/mL, corresponding to an estimated 5.4X104 genome copies/ml maximum. The increased throughput of the benchtop sequencers, the Ion Torrent PGM and Illumina MiSeq platforms, enabled detection of viral genomes at concentrations as low as 1X104 genome copies/mL. Platform-specific biases were evident in sequence read distributions as well as viral genome coverage. For bacterial samples, only the MiSeq platform was able to provide sequencing reads that could be unambiguously classified as originating from Bacillus anthracis.
conclusionThe analytical sensitivity of all three platforms approaches that of standard qPCR assays. Although all platforms were able to detect pathogens at the levels tested, there were several noteworthy differences. The Roche-454 Titanium platform produced consistently longer reads, even when compared with the latest chemistry updates for the PGM platform. The MiSeq platform produced consistently greater depth and breadth of coverage, while the Ion Torrent was unequaled for speed of sequencing. None of the platforms were able to verify a single nucleotide polymorphism responsible for antiviral resistance in an Influenza A strain isolated from the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. Overall, the benchtop platforms perform well for identification of pathogens from a representative clinical sample. However, unlike identification, characterization of pathogens is likely to require higher titers, multiple libraries and/or multiple sequencing runs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.