Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24495265›Full record

ArticleRadiology2014

MR imaging of the prostate and adjacent anatomic structures before, during, and after ejaculation: qualitative and quantitative evaluation.

Milica Medved, Steffen Sammet, Ambereen Yousuf, Aytekin Oto

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07243795 (Impact of Preoperative Ejaculation or Abstinence on Seminal Vesicle Size and Intraoperative Dissection Parameters During Radical Prostatectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07243795 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Preoperative Ejaculation or Abstinence on Seminal Vesicle Size and Intraoperative Dissection Parameters During Radical Prostatectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Taiwan University HospitalRan2025 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsProstate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical ProstatectomyArmsRecent Ejaculation, Preoperative Abstinence
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Prostate Cancer Local Staging with Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Radiologic clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. State-of-the-art Prostate Imaging.Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Stimulated echo based mapping (STEM) of TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. MR/US Fusion Technology: What Makes It Tick?Current urology reports · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. [MR imaging of the prostate].Der Radiologe · 2015
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Milica MedvedFrom the Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 2026, Chicago, IL 60637.
Steffen Sammet
Ambereen Yousuf
Aytekin Oto

Funding

Cancer Nanotechnology in Imaging and RadiotherapyR25CA132822 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI WOLOSCHAK, GAYLE E. · 2009 to 2013
$2.0M
Improving neurologic outcome measurement for interventional research in IbadanR25NS080949 · NINDS · COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN · PI EPSTEIN, LEON G, OGUNNIYI, ADESOLA · 2012 to 2014
$811k
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA132822NINDS NIH HHS R25 NS080949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the possibility of obtaining high-quality magnetic resonance (MR) images before, during, and immediately after ejaculation and detecting measurable changes in quantitative MR imaging parameters after ejaculation. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this prospective, institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant study, eight young healthy volunteers (median age, 22.5 years), after providing informed consent, underwent MR imaging while masturbating to the point of ejaculation. A 1.5-T MR imaging unit was used, with an eight-channel surface coil and a dynamic single-shot fast spin-echo sequence. In addition, a quantitative MR imaging protocol that allowed calculation of T1, T2, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values was applied before and after ejaculation. Volumes of the prostate and seminal vesicles (SV) were calculated by using whole-volume segmentation on T2-weighted images, both before and after ejaculation. Pre- and postejaculation changes in quantitative MR parameters and measured volumes were evaluated by using the Wilcoxon signed rank test with Bonferroni adjustment.

resultsThere was no significant change in prostate volumes on pre- and postejaculation images, while the SV contracted by 41% on average (median, 44.5%; P = .004). No changes before and after ejaculation were observed in T1 values or in T2 and ADC values in the central gland, while T2 and ADC values were significantly reduced in the peripheral zone by 12% and 14%, respectively (median, 13% and 14.5%, respectively; P = .004).

conclusionSuccessful dynamic MR imaging of ejaculation events and the ability to visualize internal sphincter closure, passage of ejaculate, and significant changes in SV volumes were demonstrated. Significant changes in peripheral zone T2 and ADC values were observed.

Indexed as

AdultEjaculationHealthy VolunteersHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePilot ProjectsProspective StudiesProstate

Identifiers

PMID24495265
PMCPMC4610904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.