ArticleRadiology2014
MR imaging of the prostate and adjacent anatomic structures before, during, and after ejaculation: qualitative and quantitative evaluation.
Article in Radiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07243795 (Impact of Preoperative Ejaculation or Abstinence on Seminal Vesicle Size and Intraoperative Dissection Parameters During Radical Prostatectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact of Preoperative Ejaculation or Abstinence on Seminal Vesicle Size and Intraoperative Dissection Parameters During Radical Prostatectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does Abstinence From Ejaculation Before Prostate MRI Improve Evaluation of the Seminal Vesicles?AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2016Trial
- Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of T2-Weighted Imaging Signal Variations in Prostate MRI Following Different Abstinence Periods: A Study in Young Healthy Men.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Prostate Cancer Local Staging with Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Radiologic clinics of North America · 2024Review
- Quantitative longitudinal mapping of radiation-treated prostate cancer using MR fingerprinting with radial acquisition and subspace reconstruction.Magnetic resonance imaging · 2023Article
- State-of-the-art Prostate Imaging.Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2023Review
- Repeatability and Reproducibility Assessment of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in the Prostate: A Trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Research Group (ACRIN 6701).Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2022Article
- Male Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction: An Underrepresented Endpoint in Toxicology Research.Toxics · 2022Review
- Prostate imaging features on magnetic resonance imaging of young patients.Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2022Article
- Quality of Prostate MRI: Is the PI-RADS Standard Sufficient?Academic radiology · 2021Article
- Multiparametric MRI - local staging of prostate cancer and beyond.Radiology and oncology · 2019Review
- Stimulated echo based mapping (STEM) of TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2019Article
- Quantitative diffusion MRI using reduced field-of-view and multi-shot acquisition techniques: Validation in phantoms and prostate imaging.Magnetic resonance imaging · 2018Article
- Significant changes of T2 value in the peripheral zone and seminal vesicles after ejaculation.European radiology · 2018Article
- Performance of a fast and high-resolution multi-echo spin-echo sequence for prostate TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2018Article
- The longitudinal effect of ejaculation on seminal vesicle fluid volume and whole-prostate ADC as measured on prostate MRI.European radiology · 2017Article
- The association between seminal vesicle size and duration of abstinence from ejaculation.Andrologia · 2017Article
- MR/US Fusion Technology: What Makes It Tick?Current urology reports · 2017Review
- PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2.European urology · 2016Article
- [MR imaging of the prostate].Der Radiologe · 2015Review
- Implementation of Multi-parametric Prostate MRI in Clinical Practice.Current urology reports · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo determine the possibility of obtaining high-quality magnetic resonance (MR) images before, during, and immediately after ejaculation and detecting measurable changes in quantitative MR imaging parameters after ejaculation. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this prospective, institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant study, eight young healthy volunteers (median age, 22.5 years), after providing informed consent, underwent MR imaging while masturbating to the point of ejaculation. A 1.5-T MR imaging unit was used, with an eight-channel surface coil and a dynamic single-shot fast spin-echo sequence. In addition, a quantitative MR imaging protocol that allowed calculation of T1, T2, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values was applied before and after ejaculation. Volumes of the prostate and seminal vesicles (SV) were calculated by using whole-volume segmentation on T2-weighted images, both before and after ejaculation. Pre- and postejaculation changes in quantitative MR parameters and measured volumes were evaluated by using the Wilcoxon signed rank test with Bonferroni adjustment.
resultsThere was no significant change in prostate volumes on pre- and postejaculation images, while the SV contracted by 41% on average (median, 44.5%; P = .004). No changes before and after ejaculation were observed in T1 values or in T2 and ADC values in the central gland, while T2 and ADC values were significantly reduced in the peripheral zone by 12% and 14%, respectively (median, 13% and 14.5%, respectively; P = .004).
conclusionSuccessful dynamic MR imaging of ejaculation events and the ability to visualize internal sphincter closure, passage of ejaculate, and significant changes in SV volumes were demonstrated. Significant changes in peripheral zone T2 and ADC values were observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.