ArticleAnalytical chemistry2014
QC metrics from CPTAC raw LC-MS/MS data interpreted through multivariate statistics.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- MSstatsQC-ML: A Supervised Machine Learning Approach to Monitor System Suitability and Quality Control in Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics.Journal of proteome research · 2026Article
- Standard operating procedure combined with comprehensive quality control system for multiple LC-MS platforms urinary proteomics.Nature communications · 2025Article
- iDIA-QC: AI-empowered data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry-based quality control.Nature communications · 2025Article
- A Framework for Quality Control in Quantitative Proteomics.Journal of proteome research · 2024Article
- Reference Materials for Improving Reliability of Multiomics Profiling.Phenomics (Cham, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- A framework for quality control in quantitative proteomics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Multi-omics data integration using ratio-based quantitative profiling with Quartet reference materials.Nature biotechnology · 2024Article
- A uniform data processing pipeline enables harmonized nanoparticle protein corona analysis across proteomics core facilities.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Affinity-Based Interactome Analysis of Endogenous LINE-1 Macromolecules.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Quality Control Analysis in Real-time (QC-ART): A Tool for Real-time Quality Control Assessment of Mass Spectrometry-based Proteomics Data.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2018Article
- Data-independent acquisition-based SWATH-MS for quantitative proteomics: a tutorial.Molecular systems biology · 2018Review
- QCloud: A cloud-based quality control system for mass spectrometry-based proteomics laboratories.PloS one · 2018Article
- BatMass: a Java Software Platform for LC-MS Data Visualization in Proteomics and Metabolomics.Journal of proteome research · 2016Article
- Reproducibility of Differential Proteomic Technologies in CPTAC Fractionated Xenografts.Journal of proteome research · 2016Article
- The 2012/2013 ABRF Proteomic Research Group Study: Assessing Longitudinal Intralaboratory Variability in Routine Peptide Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Analyses.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2015Article
- Proteomic analysis of colon and rectal carcinoma using standard and customized databases.Scientific data · 2015Article
- Defining Spectral Quality in Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics: A Retrospective Review.Mass spectrometry reviewsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Shotgun proteomics experiments integrate a complex sequence of processes, any of which can introduce variability. Quality metrics computed from LC-MS/MS data have relied upon identifying MS/MS scans, but a new mode for the QuaMeter software produces metrics that are independent of identifications. Rather than evaluating each metric independently, we have created a robust multivariate statistical toolkit that accommodates the correlation structure of these metrics and allows for hierarchical relationships among data sets. The framework enables visualization and structural assessment of variability. Study 1 for the Clinical Proteomics Technology Assessment for Cancer (CPTAC), which analyzed three replicates of two common samples at each of two time points among 23 mass spectrometers in nine laboratories, provided the data to demonstrate this framework, and CPTAC Study 5 provided data from complex lysates under Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) to complement these findings. Identification-independent quality metrics enabled the differentiation of sites and run-times through robust principal components analysis and subsequent factor analysis. Dissimilarity metrics revealed outliers in performance, and a nested ANOVA model revealed the extent to which all metrics or individual metrics were impacted by mass spectrometer and run time. Study 5 data revealed that even when SOPs have been applied, instrument-dependent variability remains prominent, although it may be reduced, while within-site variability is reduced significantly. Finally, identification-independent quality metrics were shown to be predictive of identification sensitivity in these data sets. QuaMeter and the associated multivariate framework are available from http://fenchurch.mc.vanderbilt.edu and http://homepages.uc.edu/~wang2x7/ , respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.