Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24494671›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2014

QC metrics from CPTAC raw LC-MS/MS data interpreted through multivariate statistics.

Xia Wang, Matthew C Chambers, Lorenzo J Vega-Montoto, David M Bunk, Stephen E Stein, David L Tabb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. A framework for quality control in quantitative proteomics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Affinity-Based Interactome Analysis of Endogenous LINE-1 Macromolecules.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xia WangDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Cincinnati , Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, United States.
Matthew C Chambers
Lorenzo J Vega-Montoto
David M Bunk
Stephen E Stein
David L Tabb

Funding

Vanderbilt Proteome Characterization CenterU24CA159988 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI LIEBLER, DANIEL C · 2011 to 2016
$13.9M
Clinical Proteomic Technology Assessment for CancerU24CA126479 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LIEBLER, DANIEL C · 2006 to 2010
$7.9M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA126479NCI NIH HHS U24 CA159988
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shotgun proteomics experiments integrate a complex sequence of processes, any of which can introduce variability. Quality metrics computed from LC-MS/MS data have relied upon identifying MS/MS scans, but a new mode for the QuaMeter software produces metrics that are independent of identifications. Rather than evaluating each metric independently, we have created a robust multivariate statistical toolkit that accommodates the correlation structure of these metrics and allows for hierarchical relationships among data sets. The framework enables visualization and structural assessment of variability. Study 1 for the Clinical Proteomics Technology Assessment for Cancer (CPTAC), which analyzed three replicates of two common samples at each of two time points among 23 mass spectrometers in nine laboratories, provided the data to demonstrate this framework, and CPTAC Study 5 provided data from complex lysates under Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) to complement these findings. Identification-independent quality metrics enabled the differentiation of sites and run-times through robust principal components analysis and subsequent factor analysis. Dissimilarity metrics revealed outliers in performance, and a nested ANOVA model revealed the extent to which all metrics or individual metrics were impacted by mass spectrometer and run time. Study 5 data revealed that even when SOPs have been applied, instrument-dependent variability remains prominent, although it may be reduced, while within-site variability is reduced significantly. Finally, identification-independent quality metrics were shown to be predictive of identification sensitivity in these data sets. QuaMeter and the associated multivariate framework are available from http://fenchurch.mc.vanderbilt.edu and http://homepages.uc.edu/~wang2x7/ , respectively.

Indexed as

Quality ControlAnalysis of VarianceChromatography, LiquidHumansMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsTandem Mass SpectrometryNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24494671
PMCPMC3982976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.