Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24493755›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2014

Targeting ion transport in cancer.

E Oosterwijk, R J Gillies

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Chemoresistance: The hidden barrier in cancer treatment.Cancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Targeting Ion Channels for Cancer Treatment: Current Progress and Future Challenges.Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Ion channels in cancer: future perspectives and clinical potential.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

E OosterwijkDepartment of Urology, 267 Experimental Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, , PO Box 9101, Nijmegen 6500 HB, The Netherlands.
R J Gillies
Moffitt Cancer Center · USRadboud University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The metabolism of cancer cells differs substantially from normal cells, including ion transport. Although this phenomenon has been long recognized, ion transporters have not been viewed as suitable therapeutic targets. However, the acidic pH values present in tumours which are well outside of normal limits are now becoming recognized as an important therapeutic target. Carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) is fundamental to tumour pH regulation. CAIX is commonly expressed in cancer, but lowly expressed in normal tissues and that presents an attractive target. Here, we discuss the possibilities of exploiting the acidic, hypoxic tumour environment as possible target for therapy. Additionally, clinical experience with CAIX targeting in cancer patients is discussed.

Indexed as

Acid-Base EquilibriumAcidosisAnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmCarbonic Anhydrase IXCarbonic AnhydrasesHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationIon TransportMiceNeoplasmsTumor MicroenvironmentAntigens, NeoplasmCA9 protein, humanCarbonic Anhydrase IXCarbonic Anhydrasescarbonic anhydrase IXclinical experiencetargetingtranslationtumour acidity

Identifiers

PMID24493755
PMCPMC3917361
OpenAlexW2005703494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.