Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24493411›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2014

Impact of distance-based metric learning on classification and visualization model performance and structure-activity landscapes.

Natalia V Kireeva, Svetlana I Ovchinnikova, Sergey L Kuznetsov, Andrey M Kazennov, Aslan Yu Tsivadze

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Natalia V KireevaFrumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry RAS, Leninsky Prospect, 31a, 119071, Moscow, Russia, nkireeva@gmail.com.
Svetlana I Ovchinnikova
Sergey L Kuznetsov
Andrey M Kazennov
Aslan Yu Tsivadze

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study concerns large margin nearest neighbors classifier and its multi-metric extension as the efficient approaches for metric learning which aimed to learn an appropriate distance/similarity function for considered case studies. In recent years, many studies in data mining and pattern recognition have demonstrated that a learned metric can significantly improve the performance in classification, clustering and retrieval tasks. The paper describes application of the metric learning approach to in silico assessment of chemical liabilities. Chemical liabilities, such as adverse effects and toxicity, play a significant role in drug discovery process, in silico assessment of chemical liabilities is an important step aimed to reduce costs and animal testing by complementing or replacing in vitro and in vivo experiments. Here, to our knowledge for the first time, a distance-based metric learning procedures have been applied for in silico assessment of chemical liabilities, the impact of metric learning on structure-activity landscapes and predictive performance of developed models has been analyzed, the learned metric was used in support vector machines. The metric learning results have been illustrated using linear and non-linear data visualization techniques in order to indicate how the change of metrics affected nearest neighbors relations and descriptor space.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceComputer SimulationStructure-Activity RelationshipCarcinogenicity TestsCluster AnalysisERG1 Potassium ChannelEther-A-Go-Go Potassium ChannelsFactor Xa InhibitorsModels, TheoreticalPrincipal Component AnalysisSoftwareERG1 Potassium ChannelEther-A-Go-Go Potassium ChannelsFactor Xa Inhibitors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.