Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24493009›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care

Retention in care within 1 year of initial HIV care visit in a multisite US cohort: who's in and who's out?

Ellen M Tedaldi, James T Richardson, Rachel Debes, Benjamin Young, Joan S Chmiel, Marcus D Durham, John T Brooks, Kate Buchacz, HOPS Investigators

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ellen M TedaldiDepartment of Medicine, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
James T Richardson
Rachel Debes
Benjamin Young
Joan S Chmiel
Marcus D Durham
John T Brooks
Kate Buchacz
HOPS Investigators

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999PHS HHS 200-2001-00133PHS HHS 200-2006-18797PHS HHS 200-2011-41872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biannual attendance at medical visits is an established measure of retention in HIV care. We examined factors associated with attending at least 2 clinic visits at least 90 days apart among HIV-infected, antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive HIV Outpatient Study participants entering care during 2000 to 2011. Of 1441 patients, 85% were retained in care during the first year of observation. Starting ART during the year was the strongest correlate of retention (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 6.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.4-9.4). After adjusting for starting ART, publicly insured patients (aOR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-1.0), and patients with baseline CD4 counts <200 cells/mm(3) (aOR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.9) or missing CD4 counts (aOR 0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.6) were less likely to be retained in care. Although most patients had recommended biannual care visits, some ART-naive individuals may require additional interventions to remain in care. Promptly initiating ART may facilitate engagement in care.

Indexed as

Patient ComplianceAdultAmbulatory Care FacilitiesAnti-Retroviral AgentsCD4 Lymphocyte CountCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInsurance, HealthMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPatient Acceptance of Health CareProspective StudiesRacial GroupsAnti-Retroviral Agentsantiretroviral adherenceHIV infectionretention

Identifiers

PMID24493009
PMCPMC4657738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.