SynthesisTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014
Lack of association between -174G>C and -634C>G polymorphisms in interleukin-6 promoter region and lung cancer risk: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between interleukin-6 polymorphisms and urinary system cancer risk: evidence from a meta-analysis.OncoTargets and therapy · 2016Article
- Genetic polymorphisms of IL-6 and IL-10 genes correlate with lung cancer in never-smoking Han population in China.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evidence suggested that the -174G>C and -634C>G polymorphisms in interleukin-6 (IL6) promoter region may modulate risk of lung cancer; however, the conclusion was still inconclusive. Therefore, we performed this meta-analysis to determine the association between IL6 -174G>C and -634C>G polymorphisms and lung cancer risk. The association strength was measured by odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Egger's test and Begg's test were performed to detect potential publication bias. By searching PubMed, EMBASE and China National Knowledge Infrastructure, we included 16 eligible studies in this meta-analysis, involving 6,202 lung cancer cases and 7,067 controls. Five studies about -174G>C polymorphism and 11 studies about -634C>G polymorphism were analyzed. By pooling eligible studies, we found no significant association of -174G>C with lung cancer risk (C vs. G: OR = 1.029; 95% CI, 0.957-1.106; heterogeneity, P = 0.478) and no statistic association of -634C > G with lung cancer susceptibility (G vs. C: OR = 1.050; 95% CI, 0.893-1.235; Heterogeneity, P < 0.001). No significant publication bias was observed. In conclusion, we found that -634C>G and -174G>C polymorphisms in IL6 promoter region were not associated with lung cancer risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.