Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24492812›Full record

ReviewContinuum (Minneapolis, Minn.)2014

Cerebrovascular disorders complicating pregnancy.

Steven K Feske, Aneesh B Singhal

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Stroke in Pregnancy: A Multidisciplinary Approach.Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Preeclampsia and Cerebrovascular Disease.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Causes and Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke During Pregnancy.Current treatment options in neurology · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Steven K Feske
Aneesh B Singhal

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis article discusses the physiologic changes of pregnancy and how they affect risk of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke and then reviews epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke in pregnancy and the puerperium. RECENT

findingsThis article updates our understanding of the relationship of preeclampsia/eclampsia to the posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome and the reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome, emphasizing their shared pathogenesis. It reviews the most recent data and offers recommendations concerning the use of thrombolytic and other revascularization therapies for pregnancy-related strokes. SUMMARY: Although cerebrovascular complications are uncommon occurrences during pregnancy and the puerperium, stroke is still the most common seriously disabling complication of pregnancy. Therefore, stroke and other vascular issues raise questions about the best evaluation and management that is safe for mother and child.

Indexed as

AdultCerebrovascular DisordersFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsTomography Scanners, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24492812
PMCPMC10563900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.