Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24492710›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2014

Genomic imprinting in mammals.

Denise P Barlow, Marisa S Bartolomei

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 393 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
393citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

393 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 721 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Recurrent Alternate Parthenogenesis in the Common Smooth-Hound Shark (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Species-Specific Parent-Of-Origin Expression of Adam23 in the Mammalian Brain.Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms · 2026
    Article
  15. TET3 protects theiScience · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. PHLDA2 in cancer: From molecular mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

333 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Denise P BarlowCeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, CeMM, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Marisa S Bartolomei
CeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine · ATUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic imprinting affects a subset of genes in mammals and results in a monoallelic, parental-specific expression pattern. Most of these genes are located in clusters that are regulated through the use of insulators or long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs). To distinguish the parental alleles, imprinted genes are epigenetically marked in gametes at imprinting control elements through the use of DNA methylation at the very least. Imprinted gene expression is subsequently conferred through lncRNAs, histone modifications, insulators, and higher-order chromatin structure. Such imprints are maintained after fertilization through these mechanisms despite extensive reprogramming of the mammalian genome. Genomic imprinting is an excellent model for understanding mammalian epigenetic regulation.

Indexed as

AllelesAnimalsChromatinChromosomesDNA MethylationGenomic ImprintingHistonesMammalsParentsRNA, Long NoncodingChromatinHistonesRNA, Long Noncoding

Identifiers

PMID24492710
PMCPMC3941233
OpenAlexW2125522929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.