Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24492633›Full record

ArticleMedicine and science in sports and exercise2014

Reliability and validity of a domain-specific last 7-d sedentary time questionnaire.

Katrien Wijndaele, Ilse DE Bourdeaudhuij, Job G Godino, Brigid M Lynch, Simon J Griffin, Kate Westgate, Søren Brage

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03612882 (Investigating the Relationship Between Sedentary Behaviour and Subjective Well-being in University Students), which is not on this map. Cited by 71 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03612882 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Investigating the Relationship Between Sedentary Behaviour and Subjective Well-being in University Students: A Cross-sectional Study

TypeobservationalSponsorWestern University, CanadaRan2018 to 2019Enrolled1,006ConditionsSedentary BehaviourArmsOnline questionnaire
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Standing up against office sitting: A study protocol.The South African journal of physiotherapy · 2020
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katrien Wijndaele1MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, UNITED KINGDOM; 2Department of Movement and Sport Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, BELGIUM; 3Physical Activity Laboratory, Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, AUSTRALIA; 4Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, AUSTRALIA.
Ilse DE Bourdeaudhuij
Job G Godino
Brigid M Lynch
Simon J Griffin
Kate Westgate
Søren Brage

Funding

EPIDEMIOLOGY AND BIOSTATISTICS OF AGINGT32AG000247 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Karen J. Bandeen-Roche · 1996 to 2026
$13.2M
British Heart Foundation FS/12/58/29709Medical Research Council MC_U106179473Medical Research Council MC_U106179474Medical Research Council MC_UU_12015/3Medical Research Council MC_UU_12015/4NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe objective of this study is to examine test-retest reliability, criterion validity, and absolute agreement of a self-report, last 7-d sedentary behavior questionnaire (SIT-Q-7d), which assesses total daily sedentary time as an aggregate of sitting/lying down in five domains (meals, transportation, occupation, nonoccupational screen time, and other sedentary time). Dutch (DQ) and English (EQ) versions of the questionnaire were examined.

methodsFifty-one Flemish adults (ages 39.4 ± 11.1 yr) wore a thigh accelerometer (activPAL3™) and simultaneously kept a domain log for 7 d. The DQ was subsequently completed twice (median test-retest interval: 3.3 wk). Thigh-acceleration sedentary time was log annotated to create comparable domain-specific and total sedentary time variables. Four hundred two English adults (ages 49.6 ± 7.3 yr) wore a combined accelerometer and HR monitor (Actiheart) for 6 d to objectively measure total sedentary time. The EQ was subsequently completed twice (median test-retest interval: 3.4 wk). In both samples, the questionnaire reference frame overlapped with the criterion measure administration period. All participants had five or more valid days of criterion data, including one or more weekend day.

resultsTest-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (95% CI)) was fair to good for total sedentary time (DQ: 0.68 (0.50-0.81); EQ: 0.53 (0.44-0.62)) and poor to excellent for domain-specific sedentary time (DQ: from 0.36 (0.10-0.57) (meals) to 0.66 (0.46-0.79) (occupation); EQ: from 0.45 (0.35-0.54) (other sedentary time) to 0.76 (0.71-0.81) (meals)). For criterion validity (Spearman rho), significant correlations were found for total sedentary time (DQ: 0.52; EQ: 0.22; all P <0.001). Compared with domain-specific criterion variables (DQ), modest-to-strong correlations were found for domain-specific sedentary time (from 0.21 (meals) to 0.76 (P < 0.001) (screen time)). The questionnaire generally overestimated sedentary time compared with criterion measures.

conclusionThe SIT-Q-7d appears to be a useful tool for ranking individuals in large-scale observational studies examining total and domain-specific sitting.

Indexed as

Sedentary BehaviorSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesActigraphyActivities of Daily LivingAdultFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, AmbulatoryMovementPsychometricsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID24492633
PMCPMC4047320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.