Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24491409›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2014

A comparison of the imaging characteristics and microregional distribution of 4 hypoxia PET tracers.

Sean Carlin, Hanwen Zhang, Megan Reese, Nicholas N Ramos, Qing Chen, Sally-Ann Ricketts

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. JACS Au · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Ruthenium-Based Photoactivated Chemotherapy.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Cancers · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sean CarlinRadiochemistry and Imaging Sciences Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Hanwen Zhang
Megan Reese
Nicholas N Ramos
Qing Chen
Sally-Ann Ricketts
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USAstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Memorial Sloan Kettering Small Animal Imaging ResearchR24CA083084 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI KOUTCHER, JASON ARTHUR · 1999 to 2006
$4.4M
PET Imaging of Cancer with pH (Low) Insertion Peptide (pHLIP)R01CA138468 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI LEWIS, JASON S. · 2010 to 2013
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA08748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA138468NCI NIH HHS R24 CA083084NCI NIH HHS R24 CA83084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledWe compared the imaging characteristics and hypoxia selectivity of 4 hypoxia PET radiotracers ((18)F-fluoromisonidazole [(18)F-FMISO], (18)F-flortanidazole [(18)F-HX4], (18)F-fluoroazomycin arabinoside [(18)F-FAZA], and (64)Cu-diacetyl-bis(N4-methylsemicarbazone) [(64)Cu-ATSM]) in a single murine xenograft tumor model condition using small-animal PET imaging and combined ex vivo autoradiography and fluorescence immunohistochemistry.

methodsNude mice bearing SQ20b xenograft tumors were administered 1 of 4 hypoxia PET tracers and images acquired 80-90 min after injection. Frozen sections from excised tumors were then evaluated for tracer distribution using digital autoradiography and compared with histologic markers of tumor hypoxia (pimonidazole, carbonic anydrase 9 [CA9]) and vascular perfusion (Hoechst 33342).

resultsThe highest tumor uptake was observed with (64)Cu-ATSM (maximum standardized uptake values [SUV(max)], 1.26 ± 0.13) and the lowest with (18)F-FAZA (SUVmax, 0.41 ± 0.24). (18)F-FMISO and (18)F-HX4 had similar intermediate tumor uptake (SUV(max), 0.76 ± 0.38 and 0.65 ± 0.19, respectively). Digital autoradiographs of hypoxia tracer distribution were compared pixel by pixel with images of immunohistochemistry stains. The fluorinated nitroimidazoles all showed radiotracer uptake increasing with pimonidazole and CA9 staining. (64)Cu-ATSM showed the opposite pattern, with highest radiotracer uptake observed in regions with the lowest pimonidazole and CA9 staining.

conclusionThe fluorinated nitroimidazoles showed similar tumor distributions when compared with immunohistochemistry markers of hypoxia. Variations in tumor standardized uptake value and normal tissue distribution may determine the most appropriate clinical setting for each tracer. (64)Cu-ATSM showed the highest tumor accumulation and little renal clearance. However, the lack of correlation between (64)Cu-ATSM distribution and immunohistochemistry hypoxia markers casts some doubt on the hypoxia selectivity of (64)Cu-ATSM.

Indexed as

Copper RadioisotopesAnimalsAutoradiographyCell HypoxiaCell Line, TumorCoordination ComplexesHumansMiceNitroimidazolesOrganometallic CompoundsPositron-Emission TomographyRadioactive TracersThiosemicarbazonesCoordination Complexescopper (II) diacetyl-di(N(4)-methylthiosemicarbazone)Copper RadioisotopesNitroimidazolesOrganometallic CompoundsRadioactive TracersThiosemicarbazonesanimal imagingautoradiographyhypoxiaimmunofluorescencePET

Identifiers

PMID24491409
PMCPMC4232233
OpenAlexW2011766836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.