Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24491237›Full record

ArticleJournal of vascular surgery2014

Rehospitalization to primary versus different facilities following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Richard S Saunders, Sara Fernandes-Taylor, Amy J H Kind, Travis L Engelbert, Caprice C Greenberg, Maureen A Smith, Jon S Matsumura, K Craig Kent

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vascular surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Impact of Patient Safety Indicators on readmission after abdominal aortic surgery.Journal of vascular nursing : official publication of the Society for Peripheral Vascular Nursing · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Predictors and outcomes of unplanned readmission to a different hospital.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2015
    Article
  13. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Richard S SaundersWisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program (WiSOR), Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisc.
Sara Fernandes-TaylorWisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program (WiSOR), Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisc.
Amy J H KindDepartment of Medicine, Geriatrics Division, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisc; Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), William S Middleton Hospital, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Madison, Wisc.
Travis L EngelbertWisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program (WiSOR), Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisc.
Caprice C GreenbergWisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program (WiSOR), Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisc.
Maureen A SmithDepartments of Population Health Sciences, Family Medicine and Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisc.
Jon S MatsumuraWisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program (WiSOR), Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisc.
K Craig KentWisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program (WiSOR), Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisc. Electronic address: kent@surgery.wisc.edu.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs · US

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
Non-Invasive Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Clinical Trial (N-TA^3CT )R01AG037120 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI BAXTER, BERNARD TIMOTHY, CURCI, JOHN A · 2011 to 2017
$12.2M
Vascular Surgery Research Training ProgramT32HL110853 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MATSUMURA, JON STEVEN · 2012 to 2021
$2.6M
The Hospital Discharge Summary's Impact on Sub-Acute Care Patient OutcomesK23AG034551 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KIND, AMY J. · 2010 to 2012
$556k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000427NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL110853NIA NIH HHS K23 AG034551NIA NIH HHS R01 AG037120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveReducing readmissions represents a unique opportunity to improve care and reduce health care costs and is the focus of major payers. A large number of surgical patients are readmitted to hospitals other than where the primary surgery was performed, resulting in clinical decisions that do not incorporate the primary surgeon and potentially alter outcomes. This study characterizes readmission to primary vs different hospitals after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair and examines the implications with regard to mortality and cost.

methodsPatients who underwent open or endovascular aneurysm repair for AAA were identified from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Chronic Conditions Warehouse, a random 5% national sample of Medicare beneficiaries from 2005 to 2009. Outcomes for patients who underwent AAA repair and were readmitted within 30 days of initial discharge were compared based on readmission location (primary vs different hospital).

resultsA total of 885 patients underwent AAA repair and were readmitted within 30 days. Of these, 626 (70.7%) returned to the primary facility, and 259 (29.3%) returned to a different facility. Greater distance from patient residence to the primary hospital was the strongest predictor of readmission to a different facility. Patients living 50 to 100 miles from the primary hospital were more likely to be readmitted to a different hospital compared with patients living <10 miles away (odds ratio, 8.50; P < .001). Patients with diagnoses directly related to the surgery (eg, wound infection) were more likely to be readmitted to the primary hospital, whereas medical diagnoses (eg, pneumonia and congestive heart failure) were more likely to be treated at a different hospital. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality between patients readmitted to a different or the primary hospital. Median total 30-day payments were significantly lower at different vs primary hospitals (primary, $11,978 vs different, $11,168; P = .04).

conclusionsReadmission to a different facility after AAA repair is common and occurs more frequently than for the overall Medicare population. Patients travelling a greater distance for AAA repair are more likely to return to different vs the primary hospital when further care is required. For AAA repair, quality healthcare may be achieved at marginally lower cost and with greater patient convenience for selected readmissions at hospitals other than where the initial procedure was performed.

Indexed as

Quality Assurance, Health CareAgedAortic Aneurysm, AbdominalBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationDelivery of Health CareFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth Care CostsHumansMaleMedicarePatient ReadmissionPrognosisRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID24491237
PMCPMC4028422
OpenAlexW2163852635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.