Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24491072›Full record

Trial reportJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2014

Randomized controlled trial of a Spring Break intervention to reduce high-risk drinking.

Christine M Lee, Clayton Neighbors, Melissa A Lewis, Debra Kaysen, Angela Mittmann, Irene M Geisner, David C Atkins, Cheng Zheng, Lisa A Garberson, Jason R Kilmer and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03930524 (An Adaptive Preventive Intervention to Optimize the Transition From Universal to Indicated Resources for College Student Alcohol Use), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03930524 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

An Adaptive Preventive Intervention to Optimize the Transition From Universal to Indicated Resources for College Student Alcohol Use

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MinnesotaRan2019 to 2022Enrolled891ConditionsCollege Student DrinkingArmsPersonalized Normative Feedback (PNF), Self-Monitoring (SM), Web-BASICS, Health Promotion Consultation, M-Bridge Online Health Coach
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A multivariate meta-analysis of motivational interviewing process and outcome.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. The Efficacy of an Event-Specific, Text Message, Personalized Drinking Feedback Intervention.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2019
    Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Coregulation of therapist and client emotion during psychotherapy.Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christine M LeeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington.
Clayton NeighborsDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston.
Melissa A LewisDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington.
Debra KaysenDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington.
Angela MittmannDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington.
Irene M GeisnerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington.
David C AtkinsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington.
Cheng ZhengDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington.
Lisa A GarbersonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington.
Jason R KilmerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington.
Mary E LarimerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington.
University of Washington · USUniversity of Houston · US

Funding

Event Specific PreventionR01AA016099 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LEE, CHRISTINE M. · 2007 to 2011
$2.8M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA016099NIAAA NIH HHS R01AA016099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough recent studies have documented high-risk drinking occurring during Spring Break (SB), particularly on SB trips with friends, published intervention studies are few. In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy of event specific prevention strategies for reducing SB drinking among college students, compared to general prevention strategies and an assessment-only control group, as well as evaluated inclusion of peers in interventions and mode of intervention delivery (in-person vs. web).

methodParticipants included 783 undergraduates (56.1% women; average age = 20.5 years) intending to go on a SB trip with friends as well as to drink heavily on at least 1 day of SB. Participants completed assessments prior to SB and were randomized to 1 of 5 intervention conditions: SB in-person Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for College Students (BASICS; Dimeff, Baer, Kivlahan, & Marlatt, 1999), SB web BASICS, SB in-person BASICS with friend, SB web BASICS with friend, general BASICS, or an attention control condition. Follow-up assessment was completed 1 week after SB.

resultsAlthough the SB web BASICS (with and without friends) and general BASICS interventions were not effective at reducing SB drinking, results indicated significant intervention effects for SB in-person BASICS in reducing SB drinking, particularly on trip days. Follow-up analyses indicated that change in descriptive norms mediated treatment effect and reductions in drinking, whereas SB drinking intentions and positive expectancies did not.

conclusionsOverall, results suggest that an in-person SB-specific intervention is effective at reducing SB drinking, especially during trips. In contrast, interventions that contain non-SB-related content, are web-based, or seek to involve friends may be less effective at reducing SB drinking.

Indexed as

Risk-TakingAlcohol DrinkingBinge DrinkingFemaleHumansInternetMalePeer GroupStudentsTreatment OutcomeUniversitiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24491072
PMCPMC4390296
OpenAlexW2051576505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.