Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24490875›Full record

ArticleACS nano2013

Facing the truth about nanotechnology in drug delivery.

Kinam Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS nano, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 164 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
164citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
20.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

164 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 526 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. RapidActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Advancing in vivo reprogramming with synthetic biology.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

104 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kinam ParkDepartments of Biomedical Engineering and Pharmaceutics, Purdue University , West Lafayette, Indiana 47906, United States.
Purdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

Hydrotropic Polymers for oral delivery of paclitaxelR01GM065284 · NIGMS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY WEST LAFAYETTE · PI PARK, KINAM · 2002 to 2008
$1.6M
Adaptable Polymer Micelles for Tumor TargetingR01CA129287 · NCI · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI PARK, KINAM · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
Hydrogel template method for protein microencapsulationR01GM095879 · NIGMS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI PARK, KINAM · 2012 to 2015
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS CA129287NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129287NIGMS NIH HHS GM095879NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM065284NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM095879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanotechnology in drug delivery has been manifested into nanoparticles that can have unique properties both in vitro and in vivo, especially in targeted drug delivery to tumors. Numerous nanoparticle formulations have been designed and tested to great effect in small animal models, but the translation of the small animal results to clinical success has been limited. Successful translation requires revisiting the meaning of nanotechnology in drug delivery, understanding the limitations of nanoparticles, identifying the misconceptions pervasive in the field, and facing inconvenient truths. Nanoparticle approaches can have real impact in improving drug delivery by focusing on the problems at hand, such as enhancing their drug loading capacity, affinity to target cells, and spatiotemporal control of drug release.

Indexed as

DisclosureDrug Delivery SystemsForecastingHumansNanocapsulesNanotechnologyTranslational Research, BiomedicalNanocapsules

Identifiers

PMID24490875
PMCPMC3914010
OpenAlexW2067796149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.